Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101]

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 21:35 +0100, Werner Baumann wrote:
> The spec is self-contradictory and the parts that state "semantic 
> equivalence" should be removed.

Agreed. All definitons of weak should be based on "SHOULD change when
the entity changes in a semantically significant way".

Regards
Henrik

Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 21:12:38 UTC