- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:08:59 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Am 29.02.2008 um 00:25 schrieb Mark Nottingham: > > > On 28/02/2008, at 11:26 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> It seems to me it would be unwise to say "clients SHOULD believe >> the Allow header", but "servers MAY leave of methods". >> >> If we relax the requirement for the production, we also need to >> relax the requirement for the recipient. > > > How about > > Clients SHOULD believe the Allow header > Servers SHOULD send a complete Allow header "SHOULD believe" is a new one to me. How about describing the Server requirements and leaving it at that? Those rebel clients that just try methods, well, we could add a: "server SHOULD be able to handle methods not listed in their Allow header responses". But that is underestimating the reader, or? //Stefan -- <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 09:09:20 UTC