- From: Subbu Allamaraju <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:25:09 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
That should be good enough. Thanks Mark. Subbu On Feb 26, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I'd be OK with adding a non-normative example, at the most; adding > normative language for this would imply that we're defining a sever- > side model for how HTTP should be implemented, which (as Roy has > pointed out several times), isn't a good idea. > > Cheers, > > > On 26/02/2008, at 7:59 AM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote: > >> If creating multiple resources via POST is indeed a valid >> interpretation of 2616, could this be clarified in the 2616bis? >> >> Thanks >> Subbu >> >> On Feb 4, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >>> >>> I don't think that does the trick. APP creates multiple resources >>> and returns a 201 with a Location of the "Member entry URI", >>> mentioning that other resources could have been created in the >>> process. >>> >>> So, a 201 can imply the creation of one or more resources; if the >>> response contains metadata (e.g., Location, ETag), they are >>> associated with the most important one, in the judgement of the >>> server. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 31/01/2008, at 7:14 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Should we keep this "multiple locations for one resource" >>>>>> paradigm? >>>>> >>>>> First of all, I do not agree with the "single new resource" >>>>> interpretation. As Brian observed, that would be a conflict with >>>>> RFC5023. >>>> >>>> In that case, we need to amend the current text as I read it as >>>> implying there is only one new resource. >>>> Also: >>>> <<< >>>> A 201 response MAY contain an ETag response header field indicating >>>> the current value of the entity tag for the requested variant just >>>> created, see Section 6.1 of [Part4]. >>>>>>> >>>> Should be: >>>> <<< >>>> If one single resource is created, a 201 response MAY contain... >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Baroula que barouleras, au >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:25:17 UTC