www-tag@w3.org from December 2002 by date

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

• SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14 Sandro Hawke
• RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement David Orchard
• Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Jeremy Dunck
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Walden Mathews
• RE: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Julian Reschke
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Mark Baker
• RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement David Orchard
• content negotiation anti-principle Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Simon St.Laurent
• RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Dare Obasanjo
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Roy T. Fielding
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Mark Baker

Monday, 30 December 2002

• Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR David Orchard
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Mark Baker
• [Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: I-D ACTION:draft-connolly-w3c-accessible-registries-00.txt] Mark Baker
• Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Mark Baker
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR David Orchard
• WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement Sandro Hawke
• Content negotiation issues (was XInclude) Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR MURATA Makoto
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Daniel Veillard

Sunday, 29 December 2002

• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Friday, 27 December 2002

• Architectural problems of the XInclude CR MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Thursday, 26 December 2002

• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke (Amended) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke (LinkTypes/NMTOKENS issue) Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 25 December 2002

• Re: RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Aaron Swartz

Tuesday, 24 December 2002

• RDDL proposal from Sandro Hawke Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 18 December 2002

• ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services Roger L. Costello

Friday, 20 December 2002

• Re: Delegating authority (was Re: Comments on arch document (15 November draft) Mark Baker
• Re: Delegating authority (was Re: Comments on arch document (15 November draft) Mark Nottingham
• Delegating authority (was Re: Comments on arch document (15 November draft) Mark Baker
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod

Thursday, 19 December 2002

• Comments on arch document (15 November draft) Mark Nottingham
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Simon St.Laurent
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Dare Obasanjo
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Bill de hÓra
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Julian Reschke
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Bill de hÓra
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Stefan Eissing
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Bill de hÓra
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Peter C Davis
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Stefan Eissing
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Stefan Eissing
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Misha Wolf
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Dan Connolly
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? David Orchard
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Jeremy Dunck
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 18 December 2002

• Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Mark Nottingham
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Grosso
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Miles Sabin
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Tim Bray
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Dare Obasanjo
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Paul Prescod
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Dare Obasanjo
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: uri-comp draft necessary? Misha Wolf
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Robin Berjon
• Re: [URIEquivalence-15] %hh escapes (was: [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf) Stefan Eissing
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Stefan Eissing
• [URIEquivalence-15] %hh escapes (was: [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: uri-comp draft necessary? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• re: uri-comp draft necessary? Simon St.Laurent
• uri-comp draft necessary? Tim Bray

Tuesday, 17 December 2002

• RDDL proposal from Micah Dubinko Micah Dubinko
• XML profile [was: [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf] Paul Grosso

Monday, 16 December 2002

• [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Stefan Eissing
• Re: XML-* Tim Bray

Saturday, 14 December 2002

• Re: Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 12 December 2002

• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Martin Duerst

Friday, 13 December 2002

• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Tim Bray
• Re: Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"? Mark Baker
• Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Stefan Eissing
• Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs" Tim Bray
• Re: how to specify a URL in a Schema? Tim Bray
• Re: Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"? Mike Champion
• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"? Mark Baker
• how to specify a URL in a Schema? Jeff Sonstein

Thursday, 12 December 2002

• Re: Determining what a URI identifies noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• [Agenda] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf (xmlProfiles-29, URIs, namespaceDocument-8) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Determining what a URI identifies Tim Berners-Lee

Wednesday, 11 December 2002

• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Larry Masinter
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• [binaryXML-30] Binary Infosets Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Robin Berjon
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Robin Berjon
• Re: Are the chapters of webarch in the wrong order Dan Connolly
• Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Robin Berjon
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Tim Bray
• Re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Scott Lawrence
• re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Rich Salz

Tuesday, 10 December 2002

• re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Larry Masinter
• Re: Editorial questions about first three findings Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Editorial questions about first three findings Mark Baker
• Re: Editorial questions about first three findings Ian B. Jacobs
• Editorial questions about first three findings Mark Baker
• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Williams, Stuart
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Chris Wilper
• RE: XML-* noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Dan Connolly
• Re: The RDDL challenge Patrick Stickler
• Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Tim Bray

Monday, 9 December 2002

• Are the chapters of webarch in the wrong order Tim Bray
• Re: The RDDL challenge Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces? David Orchard
• [Minutes] 9 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf (uriMediaType-9, namespaceDocument-8, xmlProfiles-29) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Dare Obasanjo
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces? Williams, Stuart
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Dan Connolly
• RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? David Orchard
• what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces? Dan Connolly
• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Paul Grosso
• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" Dan Connolly
• RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" David Orchard
• XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset" David Fallside
• RE: XML-* DPawson@rnib.org.uk

Friday, 6 December 2002

• [Publication] 6 Dec 2002 Editor's Draft of Architecture of the WWW Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: XML-* Ann Navarro
• Re: XML-* Norman Walsh
• Re: XML-* Norman Walsh
• Re: XML-* Tim Bray
• RE: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Joshua Allen
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Tim Bray
• Re: XML-* noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML-* Norman Walsh
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Jeremy Dunck
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: RDDL Proposal from Jonathan Borden was: Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Jonathan Borden
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RDDL Proposal from Jonathan Borden was: Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Jonathan Borden
• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments Richard Tobin
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Roy T. Fielding
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 5 December 2002

• RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments Martin Duerst
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Tim Bray
• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Jeremy Dunck
• Re: Commentary on 15 Nov Arch Doc WD Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Martin Duerst
• Re: IRI-Everywhere (was RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI) Martin Duerst
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Michael Mealling
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Simon St.Laurent
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Tim Bray
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Simon St.Laurent
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Mark Nottingham
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Tim Bray
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Michael Mealling
• [Agenda] 9 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Martin Duerst
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Martin Duerst
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray

Wednesday, 4 December 2002

• Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Martin Duerst
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Martin Duerst
• XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...] Paul Grosso
• subsetting XML (was Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002) Simon St.Laurent
• RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) David Orchard
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Tim Bray
• What Is the Product of this Task? (WAS RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metad ata in URIs)) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Paul Grosso
• RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) David Orchard
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Paul Grosso
• Re:generic linking Simon St.Laurent
• Re: generic linking Paul Grosso
• Re: generic linking Simon St.Laurent
• Re:generic linking Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: RDDL proposal from Chris Wilper Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• IRI-Everywhere (was RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI) jeremy carroll
• RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Paul Cotton
• RDDL proposal from Chris Wilper Chris Wilper

Tuesday, 3 December 2002

• Re: Generic link handling Tim Bray
• [Announcement] TAG Town Hall meeting at XML 2002 Conference Paul Cotton
• Re: Generic link handling Norman Walsh
• Re: Generic link handling Simon St.Laurent
• Summary of TAG activity from 5 Nov 2002 to 3 Dec 2002 Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Norman Walsh
• Re: Generic link handling Norman Walsh
• RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Tim Bray
• Re: Generic link handling Paul Prescod
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Paul Grosso
• [metadataInURI-31] Should metadata (e.g., versioning information) be encoded in URIs? Ian B. Jacobs
• [binaryXML-30] Standardize a "binary XML" format? Ian B. Jacobs
• [xmlProfiles-29] When, whither and how to profile W3C specifications in the XML Family Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Miles Sabin
• Equivalence and multiple-role URIs (WAS: Posted draft of URI comparison finding) Miles Sabin
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Robin Berjon
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset David Carlisle
• Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Robin Berjon
• Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Patrick Stickler
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Tim Bray
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Michael Mealling
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Tim Bray
• RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray Tim Bray
• [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Michael Mealling
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Champion, Mike

Monday, 2 December 2002

• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Dan Connolly
• Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Tim Bray
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Dare Obasanjo
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Tim Bray
• Re: Generic link handling Simon St.Laurent
• binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries Dan Connolly
• RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Dan Connolly
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Chris Lilley
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Dan Connolly
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Kian-Tat Lim
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Larry Masinter
• Re: Generic link handling Chris Lilley
• RE: Generic link handling Ann Navarro
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Tim Bray
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Chris Lilley
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Chris Lilley
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Michael Mealling
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Dan Connolly
• Mail archive corruption [was: Posted draft of URI comparison finding] Misha Wolf
• Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding Chris Lilley
• Re: Generic link handling Chris Lilley
• Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset Paul Prescod

Sunday, 1 December 2002

• [Agenda] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI Julian Reschke

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 13:39:40 UTC