- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:29:42 -0800
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > The TAG has already moved that XLink should be the generic linking > mechanism for XML, despite a wide variety of complaints about its > appropriateness for various domains. This statement is incorrect. To quote from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0183.html ========================================== Recently, the TAG considered the scope of XLink[1]. We concluded[2] that XLink should be used for hypertext references in user-interface oriented applications. In light of this conclusion, it is the unanimous opinion of the TAG that XLink should be used for hypertext references in XHTML 2.0. =========================================== Reasonable people are trying to work in good faith to explore these issues, and inflammatory overgeneralizations like that quoted above are not helpful. -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:29:41 UTC