- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:42:19 -0800
- To: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
- CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
Miles Sabin wrote: > noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote, > > > > >Well, I think the question is: do the revisions mandate a change to > >the normative processing and conformance rules for documents, or are > >they merely health warnings. A change to mandate RFC 2396 makes the > >following document not namespace well-formed: > > > > xmlns:p2="HTTP://example.com" > > p1:attr="1" > > p2:attr="2" /> > > > >I really, really, really don't want to go there. > > > Me neither. Everyone agrees we don't want to go there. Let's not go there. Next issue? Paul Prescod
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 12:42:57 UTC