- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:23:19 -0800
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
It seems like people are focusing on size/compressability as the only potential benefit of an alternate serialization. Another is efficiency; a binary serialization might use length-encoding, rather than using character delimiters. Cheers, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com> To: "Michael Mealling" <michael@neonym.net> Cc: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>; <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:23 AM Subject: Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries > > Michael Mealling wrote: > > >>BTW, does WBXML as it stands meet your needs? > > > > As far as I can tell, yes. > > Can you share any information about the effective compression you're > seeing with WBXML, and any other useful costs/benefits that might not be > obvious with those who haven't been to the mat with it? -Tim >
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 13:25:04 UTC