- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:11:10 +0100
- To: "Ann Navarro" <ann@webgeek.com>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, "Paul Prescod" <pprescod@blastradius.com>
On Friday, November 29, 2002, 7:59:40 PM, Ann wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of >> Chris Lilley >>> Part of the issue is that some folks do not reliably distinuish >> between an attribute of type anyURI, which there can be lots of per >> element, and a link (which can have only one such attribute that forms >> the link URI, if there is to be any metadata also associated with >> that link using standard and readily recognisable attribute names). AN> Actually I think it's more of a problem of some people assuming AN> that a link is restricted in such a manner (to one attribute AN> forming a link URI). That's NOT been the case until XLink decided AN> to make it so, despite significant outcry. Could you give some examples of a language which does not have such a restriction? -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 08:11:21 UTC