Re: The RDDL challenge

I have some examples of RDDL  in RDF at
http://www.w3.org/2002/11/rddl
with some discussion.

Tim BL


-----  > Tim Bray wrote:
> >
> > > Scope: We assume that a RDDL document is XHTML with embedded
> > > machine-readable information
> >
> >
> > This is not a proposal, just a nit/question (and in the abstract at
> > that): should XHTML be assumed or should it rather be something along
> > the lines of "human-readable XML vocabulary"? 
> 

Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 23:20:21 UTC