Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

Tim Bray wrote:
> If we believe this, we can discard the uri-comp 
> draft entirely right now and I won't put any more work into editing it. 
>  Do we believe this? -Tim

Hmm.  The announcement (member-only) of advancement of Namespaces 1.1 to 
CR (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-xml-names11-20021218/) references 
uri-comp-2, right off textuality.com, in a normative kind of way.  A bit 
surprising I'd say -Tim

Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:00:05 UTC