Re: Editorial questions about first three findings

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:37:56PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> They have "last modified" dates at the bottom. Would those
> suffice? The status sections include dates on which the
> TAG approved the findings. I can find the dates on which
> the TAG announced the findings on www-tag if the above
> dates do not suffice.

Hey, any date works for me!  I saw that date, but it didn't indicate
that is was the publication date, so I thought I better check.  Thanks!

> > - can I safely ignore the "TAG Finding:" prefix for the purposes of
> > providing a title with my reference?
> 
> I think so. Can you write something like:
> 
>   "Mapping between URIs and Internet Media Types," W3C TAG Finding,
>    S. Williams, ed., 27 May 2002.

Looks good.  I guess I'd prefer that the first three were patched, in
case others want to reference these findings consistently.  But if the
policy doesn't allow for that, I guess there's not much that can be
done.

If the TAG's happy with that reference, I'm happy with it.

Thanks again.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 15:47:08 UTC