Re: Editorial questions about first three findings

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:37:56PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> They have "last modified" dates at the bottom. Would those
> suffice? The status sections include dates on which the
> TAG approved the findings. I can find the dates on which
> the TAG announced the findings on www-tag if the above
> dates do not suffice.

Hey, any date works for me!  I saw that date, but it didn't indicate
that is was the publication date, so I thought I better check.  Thanks!

> > - can I safely ignore the "TAG Finding:" prefix for the purposes of
> > providing a title with my reference?
> I think so. Can you write something like:
>   "Mapping between URIs and Internet Media Types," W3C TAG Finding,
>    S. Williams, ed., 27 May 2002.

Looks good.  I guess I'd prefer that the first three were patched, in
case others want to reference these findings consistently.  But if the
policy doesn't allow for that, I guess there's not much that can be

If the TAG's happy with that reference, I'm happy with it.

Thanks again.

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 15:47:08 UTC