W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Editorial questions about first three findings

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:51:33 -0500
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20021210155133.F4662@www.markbaker.ca>

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:37:56PM -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> They have "last modified" dates at the bottom. Would those
> suffice? The status sections include dates on which the
> TAG approved the findings. I can find the dates on which
> the TAG announced the findings on www-tag if the above
> dates do not suffice.

Hey, any date works for me!  I saw that date, but it didn't indicate
that is was the publication date, so I thought I better check.  Thanks!

> > - can I safely ignore the "TAG Finding:" prefix for the purposes of
> > providing a title with my reference?
> I think so. Can you write something like:
>   "Mapping between URIs and Internet Media Types," W3C TAG Finding,
>    S. Williams, ed., 27 May 2002.

Looks good.  I guess I'd prefer that the first three were patched, in
case others want to reference these findings consistently.  But if the
policy doesn't allow for that, I guess there's not much that can be

If the TAG's happy with that reference, I'm happy with it.

Thanks again.

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 15:47:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:56 UTC