www-tag@w3.org from August 2002 by date

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Ian Hickson
• unregistered URI schemes, was: [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Julian Reschke
• Re: working draft on architectural principles Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 30 August 2002

• [Minutes] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, uriMediaType-9, URIEquivalence-15) Ian B. Jacobs
• suggested replacement text "circle or spline" Chris Lilley
• Re: Architectural issue: component specifications (was More on xlink- 23) Ian B. Jacobs
• Architectural issue: component specifications (was More on xlink- 23) Micah Dubinko
• RE: More on xlink-23 Didier PH Martin
• Re: More on xlink-23 Simon St.Laurent
• Re: More on xlink-23 Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: More on xlink-23 Simon St.Laurent
• WebArch WD - 1.4 Typo Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wide Web" Ian B. Jacobs
• More on xlink-23 Tim Bray
• xlinkScope-23; XForms pointer Tim Bray
• RE: URI denumerability Larry Masinter
• Re: Using URIs as language instead of as protocol element Dan Connolly

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• MORTGAGE RATES JUST DROPPED BELOW 6% FOR 30 YEARS!8018 matthew@hotmail.com

Friday, 30 August 2002

• Re: URI denumerability Miles Sabin
• Re: URI denumerability Larry Masinter
• Using URIs as language instead of as protocol element Larry Masinter
• [Agenda] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, new issues) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: working draft on architectural principles Didier PH Martin
• Re: working draft on architectural principles Chris Lilley
• Re: URI denumerability (one response to Roy, then I'll shut up ;-) Graham Klyne
• working draft on architectural principles Roy T. Fielding
• Re: URI denumerability Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 29 August 2002

• Re: Dead (but interesting) topic Re: URI denumerability Miles Sabin
• Re: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linki ng Miles Sabin
• RE: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linki ng Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linki ng Joseph Reagle
• RE: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linki ng Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Potential wild-card issue outside W3C: legality of deep linking Joseph Reagle
• Re: Dead (but interesting) topic Re: URI denumerability Stefan Eissing
• Re: Dead (but interesting) topic Re: URI denumerability Tim Bray
• RE: URI denumerability Williams, Stuart
• Re: URI denumerability Anthony B. Coates
• Re: URI denumerability Tim Bray
• Re: URI denumerability Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 28 August 2002

• Re: URI denumerability Norman Walsh
• Re: URI denumerability Miles Sabin
• RE: URI denumerability Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: URI denumerability Tim Bray
• Re: URI denumerability Paul Grosso
• RE: URI denumerability Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• URI denumerability Roy T. Fielding
• Re: toward HTTP as IETF best practice/IANA policy for registries? Mark Baker
• RE: Context dependent Mike Dierken
• Re: [Minutes] 26 Aug TAG teleconf (arch doc, RFC3023Charset-21, xlinkScope-23, augmentedInfoset-22,contentPresentation-26) Graham Klyne
• Re: toward HTTP as IETF best practice/IANA policy for registries? Graham Klyne
• Re: Context dependent Mark Baker
• Re: Context dependant (was Re: Comments on 26 August draft Stefan Eissing

Tuesday, 27 August 2002

• Context dependant (was Re: Comments on 26 August draft Mark Baker
• RE: Comments on 26 August draft Williams, Stuart
• 手錶也可以換現金哦~ time@w3.org

Monday, 26 August 2002

• [Minutes] 26 Aug TAG teleconf (arch doc, RFC3023Charset-21, xlinkScope-23, augmentedInfoset-22,contentPresentation-26) Ian B. Jacobs
• [Issue contentPresentation-26] Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is architecturally sound. Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: FW: 1 page REST summary David Orchard
• Re: FW: 1 page REST summary Dan Connolly
• FW: 1 page REST summary David Orchard
• New IETF XML draft Tim Bray
• Comments on 26 August draft Tim Bray
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? [LONG] Rick Jelliffe
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Rick Jelliffe
• Re: [Publication] 26 August draft of Arch Doc available Ian B. Jacobs

Sunday, 25 August 2002

• [Publication] 26 August draft of Arch Doc available Ian B. Jacobs

Friday, 23 August 2002

• [Agenda] 26 Aug TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, augumentedInfoset-22, deepLinking-25) Ian B. Jacobs

Thursday, 22 August 2002

• TAG Issue 23 - Scope of XLink - XForms Svgdeveloper@aol.com

Wednesday, 21 August 2002

• Re: Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) Dare Obasanjo
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Stuart Ballard
• Re: Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) C.Bottelier
• RE: Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) Robert Koberg
• Re: Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) C.Bottelier
• Accessibility: Good or bad for business? (Was: Public list or not?) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 20 August 2002

• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? C. Bottelier
• Re: "Separation of Content from Presentation" Coises
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? [LONG] Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: "Separation of Content from Presentation" Simon St.Laurent
• Re: "Separation of Content from Presentation" Kynn Bartlett
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Kurt Cagle
• Re: WAI: Threat or Menace? Simon St.Laurent
• WAI: Threat or Menace? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: "Separation of Content from Presentation" Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: as"Separation of Content from Presentation" Simon St.Laurent
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Nicholas Atkinson
• "Separation of Content from Presentation" Kynn Bartlett
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Norman Walsh
• deepLinking-25 Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• [Minutes] 19 August 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Issue Request: The unqualified term "Semantics" should be avoided Miles Sabin
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Tim Bray
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Tim Bray
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) David Luce
• RE: Seperate content from presentation (was storing info in XSL -FO: new issue?) Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Paul Prescod
• Re: Issue Request: The unqualified term "Semantics" should be avoided Paul Prescod
• Re: Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: Too classy? (Was: storing info in XSL-FO) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• RE: Seperate content from presentation (was storing info in XSL -FO: new issue?) DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Robin Berjon
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Robin Berjon
• Too classy? (Was: storing info in XSL-FO) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: XHTML achieving traction (was storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]) Maurizio Vittoria
• Issue Request: The unqualified term "Semantics" should be avoided Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Public list or not? (Was What are Semantics?) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) C.Bottelier
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Tantek Çelik
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Nicholas Atkinson

Monday, 19 August 2002

• Re: Context Independent URI Aaron Swartz
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Tim Bray
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Tantek Çelik
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] L. David Baron
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Paul Prescod
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: XHTML achieving traction (was storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]) Tantek Çelik
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Paul Prescod
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) L. David Baron
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Kynn Bartlett
• Re: What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Tantek Çelik
• What are Semantics? (Was: Serving generic XML) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Jonathan Borden
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:.. .] Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Jan Roland Eriksson
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Tantek Çelik
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Paul Prescod
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) kynn@idyllmtn.com
• RE: Fragment identifiers (was: Re: introducing URIs) Larry Masinter
• Fragment identifiers (was: Re: introducing URIs) Paul Prescod
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Jonathan Borden
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Rijk van Geijtenbeek
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Serving generic XML Coises
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Serving generic XML (was: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue?) Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• RE: introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Larry Masinter
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Ian Hickson
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin

Sunday, 18 August 2002

• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Ian Hickson
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Ian Hickson
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Jonny Axelsson

Saturday, 17 August 2002

• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Dare Obasanjo
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Ian Hickson
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Tantek Çelik
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: New Issue: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Jonathan Borden

Friday, 16 August 2002

• Re: New Issue: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Norman Walsh
• Re: New Issue: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Paul Prescod
• Re: New Issue: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Norman Walsh
• More review comments (was RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for revie w) Williams, Stuart
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:. ..] Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• toward HTTP as IETF best practice/IANA policy for registries? Dan Connolly
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Dan Connolly
• "formatting properties" not ready for consistency Al Gilman
• Re: introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Tim Bray
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Tim Bray
• RE: introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Williams, Stuart
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:.. .] DPawson@rnib.org.uk
• RE: introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Williams, Stuart
• RE: introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Williams, Stuart
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Robin Berjon
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin
• RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Didier PH Martin
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Svgdeveloper@aol.com
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Norman Walsh
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Norman Walsh
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Roger Gimson
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 15 August 2002

• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Norman Walsh
• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Norman Walsh
• RE: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Norman Walsh
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Al Gilman
• New Issue: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Paul Prescod
• Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Sean B. Palmer
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (skw-...01) Dan Connolly
• storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Range of URI+fragment dereference function (new issue?) Dan Connolly
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Dan Connolly
• Range of URI+fragment dereference function Paul Prescod
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Williams, Stuart
• Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (skw-...01) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (skw-...01) Tim Bray
• [Agenda] 19 Aug 2002 TAG teleconference (architecture document) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Steven Livingstone
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (skw-...01) Williams, Stuart
• Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Mark Nottingham
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Paul Cotton

Wednesday, 14 August 2002

• URIs and "context" (was Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Mark Baker
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Dan Connolly
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (skw-...01) Dan Connolly
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Williams, Stuart
• Childist remark [was: Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review] Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• RE: Comments on archdoc section 1.1 Julian Reschke
• URIs, URIrefs (was Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Mark Baker
• Comments on archdoc section 1.1 Larry Masinter
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review (1.2 resources and URIs) Dan Connolly
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Mike Dierken

Tuesday, 13 August 2002

• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Dan Connolly
• introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...] Dan Connolly
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Mike Dierken
• RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Ian B. Jacobs

Monday, 12 August 2002

• [Minutes] 12 August 2002 TAG teleconf (architecture document) Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee

Friday, 9 August 2002

• ANN: BPEL4WS engine and editor released via alphaWorks Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Deliciously pedantic: what's the plural of URI? Roy T. Fielding
• ANN: BPEL4WS, WS-Transaction and WS-Coordination specifications published Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Bert Bos
• RE: Deliciously pedantic: what's the plural of URI? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• [Fwd: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?] Tim Bray

Tuesday, 23 July 2002

• Deliciously pedantic: what's the plural of URI? Tim Bray

Friday, 9 August 2002

• [Agenda] 12 Aug TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, xlinkScope-23) Ian B. Jacobs
• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Jeremy Dunck
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties Håkon Wium Lie
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Extreme RDF, URIs and topic maps Paul Prescod
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Thursday, 8 August 2002

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Bray
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Michael Mealling
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Miles Sabin
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• What do URIs mean? was: Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden

Wednesday, 7 August 2002

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• Summary of TAG activity from 2 July to 7 August 2002 Ian B. Jacobs

Tuesday, 6 August 2002

• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Bray
• URIs, ambiguity and RDF Graham Klyne

Monday, 5 August 2002

• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Michael Mealling
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• RE: http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Bill de hÓra
• RE: http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: httpRange proposed text Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange propose d text Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Jonathan Borden
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Norman Walsh
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange propose d text Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange propose d text Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Miles Sabin
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Michael Mealling
• http-range-14: Suggestions or silence Tim Bray
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Tim Bray

Sunday, 4 August 2002

• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Michael Mealling
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Michael Mealling
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Bill de hÓra
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin

Saturday, 3 August 2002

• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Joshua Allen
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Jonathan Borden
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Miles Sabin
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• RE: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Bill de hÓra
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Chris Lilley
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Chris Lilley
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Chris Lilley
• RE: from the RDF model theory: Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Michael Mealling
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra

Friday, 2 August 2002

• Re: httpRange proposed text Norman Walsh
• Re: URIs: resources and contradictions was: Re: httpRange proposed text Norman Walsh
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Norman Walsh
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• Re: from the RDF model theory: Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Miles Sabin
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Miles Sabin
• from the RDF model theory: Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Joshua Allen
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Paul Prescod
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Fixed Section 1.1 language Graham Klyne
• RE: Fixed Section 1.1 language Julian Reschke
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jonathan Borden
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language Al Gilman
• Re: Fixed Section 1.1 language noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Miles Sabin
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Tim Bray
• RE: fragment identifiers Joshua Allen
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Roy T. Fielding
• Re: fragment identifiers Roy T. Fielding
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Graham Klyne
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Roy T. Fielding
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Mike Dierken
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Aaron Swartz
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Graham Klyne
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Graham Klyne
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Aaron Swartz
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Miles Sabin
• RE: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Bill de hÓra
• Re: [httpRange-14] What do HTTP URIs Identify? Graham Klyne
• Re: httpRange-14 , what's the problem Roy T. Fielding

Last message date: Saturday, 31 August 2002 13:31:41 UTC