Re: [Minutes] 26 Aug TAG teleconf (arch doc, RFC3023Charset-21, xlinkScope-23, augmentedInfoset-22,contentPresentation-26) from Graham Klyne on 2002-08-28 (www-tag@w3.org from August 2002)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:27:32 +0100
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828122422.0468f120@127.0.0.1>

At 06:45 PM 8/26/02 -0400, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
>  Resolved: Move "Some resources do not have URIs. URIs are
>  denumerable, which means there are enough to give one to every
>  real number without collisions, for example." to footnote.

Surely, this is wrong? [1]  (The bit about giving one to every real number.)

Maybe more saliently, isn't this a sufficiently obscure point to not belong 
in an architecture doc?

#g

[1] http://www.math.utah.edu/~alfeld/math/sets/realproof.html

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 10:37:54 UTC