- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 22:20:54 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
On Friday, August 2, 2002, 9:37:41 PM, Norman wrote: NW> / "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> was heard to say: NW> | I would say what Joshua said even more strongly (this *is* a core NW> | principle): NW> | NW> | " NW> | When two people use the same URI to identify a resource _they are NW> | identifying the same resource_ NW> | " NW> | NW> | This is true by definition (indeed an axiom) NW> I'm not sure how to reconcile your statement that this is NW> axiomatically true when I believe it is obviously false. You can make it true by defining a resource as 'what a URI identifies'. Sinc eresources, like neutrinos, are slippery little things trhat can only be observed by the traces they leave in passing, it sort of make ssense and also makes the statement above 100% true. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 3 August 2002 16:21:21 UTC