- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 06:55:18 -0700
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- CC: tbray@textuality.com, www-style@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
> > It also states, "due to the sheer volume of email received, the > TAG cannot guarantee that every issue raised on the list will > be addressed.". Thus, clearly, issues can be raised on the public > TAG list which are not going to be formally addressed by TAG. > Why are you wishing to constrain such public discussion? This cannot be taken to imply a free-for-all. The TAG should restrict discussion on www-tag to the point where they can reasonably follow all conversations if not explicitly respond to all issues. > > If TAG wishes to change the rules for posting to www-tag (and, > for example, confine it to officially accepted TAG issues) I > suggest that another W3C list (www-tag-feeder?) > be established to allow public discussion of issues which may be > relevant for TAG. Posting one issue request is one thing. But conversing at length without a clear issue is totally different. I'd say that the latter should go to xml-dev (in this case). -- "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk." Congressman James Traficant.
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 09:58:07 UTC