- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:55:11 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda for the 19 Aug 2002 TAG teleconference is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/19-tag
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
==========================================================
[1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous:[3]12 Aug | Next: 26 Aug
[1] http://www.w3.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/12-tag-summary
Agenda for 19 August 2002 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag
archive
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Confirm scribe and Chair (SW)
2. Roll call. Regrets: PC, DO, TBL
3. Accept [7]12 Aug minutes
4. Accept this [8]agenda
5. Next meeting? Proposed 26 Aug.
6. Call to action: consider face-to-face agenda.
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/12-tag-summary
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/19-tag
1.2 Completed actions?
1. Action IJ 2002/08/12: Indicate that issue [9]URIMediaType-9
is not
indicated as closed.
2. Action IJ 2002/0812: Revise arch document to account for URI
proposal; send out announcement to www-tag in 24 hours. Make it
clear that we may not respond to all feedback. Say that we
are not
committing to respond, but not to worry; open action items won't
just be dropped. [10]Done.
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Aug/0134.html
2. Technical (60min)
2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)
See also: [11]findings.
1. [12]Architecture document
1. Review of comments on [13]13 Aug Arch Doc.
2. Action DC 2002/08/12: Ask www-tag for volunteers to
work with
TAG (and possibly IETF) on HTTP URI stuff; CRISP. [This
action supersedes the previous action: Ask IESG when IETF
decided not to use HTTP URIs to name protocols.]
3. Action TBL: 2002/07/15: Create a table of URI properties.
4. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Harvest from
[14]DanC's URI FAQ. Deadline 30 August.
2. [15]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
+ Action PC [16]2002/07/08: Propose alternative cautionary
wording for finding regarding IANA registration. Refer to
"[17]How to Register a Media Type with IANA (for the IETF
tree) "
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0805-archdoc
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Aug/0134.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ures14.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
[16] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary#media-types
[17] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
2.2 Priority issues (30min)
1. [18]httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch
Document.
2. RFC3023Charset-21:
1. Chris sent [19]information to www-tag. What is necessary to
close this issue?
3. Status of [20]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [21]URI
canonicalization and [22]email from Martin in particular.
See more
[23]comments from Martin.
1. What should a finding look like for this?
4. [24]xlinkScope-23
1. Priority of this?
5. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query
strings?
+ ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue
(bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that
it's on
their radar. See [25]discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.
6. [26]augmentedInfoset-22:
+ [27]Request from Tim Bray to decide this issue
(disposition =
closed). Pushback from Simon St. Laurent.
+ ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI.
Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an
issue next week. DanC has sent email; awaiting reply
from XML
Scheme WG.
7. [28]deepLinking-25
1. Action PC 2002/07/22: Ask Henrik Frystyk Nielsen to provide
us with a precis of the ruling. Done: awaiting reply from
Henrik.
8. [29]uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See
[30]message from DanC.
+ Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0323.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
[21] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0275.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xlinkScope-23
[25] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary.html#wsa-get
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#augmentedInfoset-22
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0159.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#deepLinking-25
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0095.html
2.3 New issues?
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2002/08/15 13:53:21 $
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 09:58:38 UTC