[Agenda] 30 Aug 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, deepLinking-25, new issues)

Hello,

An agenda for today's TAG teleconference is available
as HTML [1] and as text below. We expect to pick up
where we left off discussion of technical issues
on 26 August.

Thank you,

  - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/30-tag

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

====================================================

    [1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous:[3]26 Aug | Next: 9 Sep

       [1] http://www.w3.org/
       [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
       [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/26-tag-summary

                  Agenda for 30 August 2002 TAG teleconference

    Nearby: [4]Teleconference details · [5]issues list · [6]www-tag
    archive

       [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
       [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
       [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

    Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
    business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (15min)

     1. Confirm scribe and Chair (NW)
     2. Roll call. Regrets: TBL, PC, SW, RF?
     3. Accept [7]26 Aug minutes
     4. Accept this [8]agenda
     5. Next meeting? Proposed 9 Sep.

       [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/26-tag-summary
       [8] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/30-tag

   1.2 Completed actions?

     1. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Harvest from
        [9]DanC's URI FAQ. Deadline 30 August.
     2. Arch doc actions from [10]26 August:
          1. All resolutions taken into account.
          2. Action IJ and NW: Work on this footnote text. Foot note
             deleted.
          3. Action IJ: Tweak this text to reflect TB and RF comments.
          4. Action IJ: Talk to Janet about press release issue. No 
press
             release.
          5. Action DC: Get another w3m member to approve short name
             (since first public WD): webarch
     3. Action IJ: Update issues list w.r.t. closing
        [11]augmentedInfoset-22
     4. Action IJ: Announce new issue contentPresentation-26.

       [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ures14.html
      [10] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/26-tag-summary
      [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#augmentedInfoset-22

2. Technical (60min)

   2.1 Priority issues (30min)

     1. [12]httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch
        Document.
     2. RFC3023Charset-21:
          1. Chris sent [13]information to www-tag. What is necessary to
             close this issue?
          2. Action IJ 2002/09/26: Work CL language into "[14]TAG 
Finding:
             Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use". Ping
             PC to let him know (since he has some text to change as
             well).
     3. [15]xlinkScope-23
          1. Priority of this?
     4. [16]deepLinking-25
     5. [17]uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See
        [18]message from DanC.
           + Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.
     6. Status of [19]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
        the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [20]URI
        canonicalization and [21]email from Martin in particular. 
See more
        [22]comments from Martin.
          1. What should a finding look like for this?
     7. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query
        strings?
           + ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue
             (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that 
it's on
             their radar. See [23]discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.

      [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
      [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0323.html
      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
      [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xlinkScope-23
      [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#deepLinking-25
      [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
      [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0095.html
      [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
      [20] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
      [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
      [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0275.html
      [23] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary.html#wsa-get

   2.2 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)

    See also: [24]findings.
     1. [25]Architecture document
          1. Action DC 2002/08/12: Ask www-tag for volunteers to 
work with
             TAG (and possibly IETF) on HTTP URI stuff; CRISP. [This
             action supersedes the previous action: Ask IESG when IETF
[            decided not to use HTTP URIs to name protocols.] [26]Sent.
             Awaiting reply.
          2. Action TBL: 2002/07/15: Create a table of URI properties.
     2. [27]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
           + Action PC [28]2002/07/08: Propose alternative cautionary
             wording for finding regarding IANA registration. Refer to
             "[29]How to Register a Media Type with IANA (for the IETF
             tree) "

      [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
      [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0813-archdoc
      [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Aug/0196.html
      [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
      [28] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary#media-types
      [29] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

   2.3 New issues?

      * Use of frags in SVG v. in XML
           + Action DC 2002/09/26: Describe this issue in more 
detail for
             the TAG.

      _________________________________________________________________


     Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
     Last modified: $Date: 2002/08/30 15:29:04 $

Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 11:42:54 UTC