- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:14:17 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <www-style@w3.org>, <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
[+BCC to WAI PF] > I'll leave it to the editor(s) to address your suggestion about > the text of the finding, but it seems to me that just omitting > XSL-FO from that phrase won't address the issue you raise > about whether it's appropriate to use XSL-FO to store > information. > > It looks like a new issue. A new issue for TAG perhaps, but the WAI PF WG have been tackling such issues for a number of months now as part of the work on the XML Accessibility Guidelines. I refer you to checkpoint 2.1 of the current working draft:- http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xmlgl-20010829#cp2_1 - 2.1 Ensure all semantics are captured in markup in a repurposeable form. XML Accessibility Guidelines W3C Working Draft 29 August 2001 I'm not sure how much of this is an architecural issue rather than accessibility; I suppose that this is for the chairs of the relevant groups to decide. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 15:14:28 UTC