Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> The battle's lost. XHTML 1.0 has achieved no significant 
> traction.

Actually, much to my dismay (although that's another story) XHTML1 has
achieved huge traction.


> If you want semantically tagged information, jump to pure XML

XHTML1 _is_ pure XML.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
"meow"                                          /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Saturday, 17 August 2002 16:13:16 UTC