- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:36:50 -0500
- To: "'Bill de hOra'" <dehora@eircom.net>, "'Tim Berners-Lee'" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hmm. It seems that all the identifier can do is identify the authority and the thing asserted by that authority. This doesn't argue meaning other than THAT explicit source asserts THIS. That is ok. It doesn't get around having a minimal two-level system with regards to interpretive meaning. One cannot dispute that this authority says this, but one has to rely on 1. Further assertions from that authority for interpretations 2. Other assertions that point to that authority's assertions. Again, nothing wrong with that. I believe that we have come to some kind of consensus here that strongly suggests why the use of technologies such as RDDL and RDF have value: to annotate and correlate the interpretations. As has been stated, the use of the URI to point to a separate interpretive document is not mandated, but very useful. The role of the URI in the XML namespace as a syntactical device to disambiguate names is fixed, not arguable. The use of it to cite an interpretive document is not fixed, but it is wise. To know what some authority asserts it means, we have to ask the cat. The problem, of course, is to separate the ownership of the assertion from the ownership of the knowledge. The Semantic Web will be a disaster if we can't do that. I don't think the solution is technical; it is legal. It is also a different issue. len -----Original Message----- From: Bill de hOra [mailto:dehora@eircom.net] > From: Tim Berners-Lee [mailto:timbl@w3.org] > > However, on the web one *does* have a way to own and be the > authority on an identifier, and there is no right of a third > party to argue that it means something else. ... Ok. What's good about that it squares with REST principles. While I don't see how we make people always do the right thing, I do see how we could build stuff on top of RDDL (or maybe DDDS) that could ask the authority directly for an answer to a questions about URI denotation in RDF.
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 10:37:29 UTC