W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > August 2002

RE: URI denumerability

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:13:00 -0500
Message-ID: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B8BF@HQ5>
To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@apache.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

Rational or irrational?  With or without the fragment id?

"Without getting technical, real numbers are all numbers that can be written as a possibly never repeating decimal fraction. For example, all rational numbers are real. Their decimal representations do repeat. Decimal fractions whose representation do not repeat are irrational. " http://www.math.utah.edu/~alfeld/math/numbers.html

I'd say that any explanation that boils down to Cantor probably doesn't belong in there.


From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@apache.org]

Yes, that was wrong -- denumerable would mean they are equivalent to
the set of natural numbers, not real numbers. 
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 17:13:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:53 UTC