- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 14 Aug 2002 13:30:44 -0500
- To: Stuart Williams <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:07, Williams, Stuart wrote: [...] > [skw-2002-08-14-01] > [...] > My preference would be that we > pulled the reference material to the front of the document with little/none > of the narrative that elaborates on a terse/crisp set of staments of > principle. Could you be more specific/concrete about what you want this stuff up front to say? I think the document has gone too far in the terseness direction. If the document doesn't motivate/justify the principles, it's of little value, to me. > The other temptation would be to put a reference at the back.... as a > recap/summary... I can live with any sort of index at the back, but please let's not just state principles with no motivation. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 14:30:00 UTC