- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:46:03 -0500
- To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
You can communicate with me because you have a human memory. Ever ask how you are creating and maintaining that? I don't suggest we debate this here. Offline is fine. I think Jonathan is right here. We can't use the human mind as an exemplar of the web. That is the flaw in Fielding's "URIs are the words of the web" approach. It is a good metaphor, but it is no more than metaphor. First, I don't see how one can do the tricks with just URIs that the human brain can do with a double articulation, and second, I don't think it is a reasonable approach to the architecture because the human mind may be operating quite differently in the way it creates, maintains, and uses memory. http://www.library.utoronto.ca/see/SEED/Vol1-2/Vitiello.htm That is a challenging article to read, but it makes some interesting assertions about the nature of mind, memory and consciousness as the establishment of meaning in an open system through interaction of self with environment. I don't recommend it as TAG reading for anyone with more pressing matters, but I do recommend it for anyone who contends that the web is a kind of living mind, a reflection of mind, or of society. len -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jonathan@openhealth.org] You don't need any theories to communicate precisely because your brain is hardwired to deal with human language. If you were endevouring to teach a machine how to understand language, you'd quickly learn to appreciate such theories :-)
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 10:46:36 UTC