- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:16:19 -0700
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, kynn@idyllmtn.com, www-tag@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
On 8/19/02 12:56 PM, "Svgdeveloper@aol.com" <Svgdeveloper@aol.com> wrote: > It seems to me that we need to be clearer about terminology since two, > seemingly intelligent, individuals interpret the semantic richness and poverty > of XML in two diametrically opposed ways. I agree Andrew. I _think_ the difference is in what is provided and what potential is enabled. XML 1.0 by itself provides _very_ minimal semantics, just xml:lang AFAIK. However XML 1.0 enables the development of very rich semantic vocabularies. Some folks see the sand, some folks imagine the sand castles that could be constructed with the sand. Tantek
Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 16:07:13 UTC