- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:28:40 +0100
- To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "'Miles Sabin'" <miles@milessabin.com>, "'WWW-Tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>
> Jonathan Borden > > Miles Sabin wrote: > > > URIs are context dependent identifiers. > > No. URIs are most certainly not context dependent identifiers. Then there exist no non-reserved vocabularies in RDF. More specifically, the interpretative function IS in the RDF Model Theory is redundant in all cases, if URIs are neither context dependent nor ambiguous referents. There's no need for a Tarskian semantics to determine the truth or falsity of a statement with respect to a given denotation, when there is only ever one denotation to be had. That's a remarkable property. regards, Bill de hÓra .. Propylon www.propylon.com
Received on Monday, 5 August 2002 14:29:14 UTC