- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:23:44 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Add to your list the New York Public Library: http://www.nypl.org/styleguide/ Which now requires that: "Branch Libraries projects must be authored in valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional and styled with valid Cascading Style Sheets." Tantek On 8/18/02 2:27 PM, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Dare Obasanjo wrote: >> >> Where has XHTML 1.0 received huge traction? > > (and Didier PH Martin <martind@netfolder.com> asked a similar question.) > > It's achieved huge traction in the number of pages on the web which > are now XHTML1 rather than HTML4 or tag soup. Many new pages that use > XHTML1 (sent as text/html, of course, so none of the advantages of > using XHTML1 are being realised, since browsers handle text/html as > tag soup). For example: > > http://www.msn.com/ > http://www.ibm.com/ > http://www.wellsfargo.com/ > http://www.ctv.ca/ > http://www.sex.com/ > http://www.dvdtalk.com/ > http://www.findwho.com/ > http://www.gnome.org/ > http://www.kde.org/ > http://www.kulturaxe.net/ > http://www.musictheory.net/ > http://mpt.phrasewise.com/ > http://www.w3.org/ > http://www.webstandards.org/ > http://www.xiven.com/ > http://www.xmlns.com/ > http://www.bigfoot.com/~alexeyc/ > http://www.chinaweblog.com/ > > Authors are increasingly using XHTML1 rather than HTML4 for new pages. > This is a trend I've noticed (as part of doing QA for Mozilla, I often > have to look at the source of recently authored web pages).
Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 17:14:36 UTC