- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 Aug 2002 17:00:30 -0500
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Cc: "'Mike Dierken'" <mike@dataconcert.com>, "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Please, please, limit the discussion to suggestions of textual changes to the document. I understand Claude Bullard's suggestion to be: strike "Open: issue deepLinking-25: What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act?" from the document. Do not attempt to address it in this document. Mike, if you have a point to make, please make it in the form: please add these words to the document: ... On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 16:11, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: [...] > From: Mike Dierken [mailto:mike@dataconcert.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:05 PM > To: Bullard, Claude L (Len); 'Ian B. Jacobs'; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review > > > In short, the TAG cannot normatively state what is or is > > not "legal" with respect to social governance. > > I think the point was that the TAG can inform the larger community of what > is and is not possible - in the same way that a meteorologist would inform a > government that outlawing the tides is not possible. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 17:59:50 UTC