RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]

DISCLAIMER: The question below was an honest, PERSONAL question on my
part and should not be used to infer anything about Microsoft's degree
of support, commitment or belief in XHTML. 

Given the direction that the subthread starting from this comment has
gone in I felt the need to add the above disclaimer.

PS: However, it seems Ian has a different definition of huge traction
than I do. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the Earth, minus 40%
inheritance tax.     

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: Ian Hickson; Elliotte Rusty Harold
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: RE: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft 
> TAG Finding:...]
> 
> 
> 
> Where has XHTML 1.0 received huge traction? 
> 
> 	-----Original Message----- 
> 	From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] 
> 	Sent: Sat 8/17/2002 1:13 PM 
> 	To: Elliotte Rusty Harold 
> 	Cc: www-tag@w3.org; www-style@w3.org 
> 	Subject: Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: 
> Draft TAG Finding:...]
> 	
> 	
> 
> 
> 	On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> 	>
> 	> The battle's lost. XHTML 1.0 has achieved no significant
> 	> traction.
> 	
> 	Actually, much to my dismay (although that's another 
> story) XHTML1 has
> 	achieved huge traction.
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 
>

Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 13:25:39 UTC