w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2000 by date

Sunday, 31 December 2000

• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Cynthia Waddell

Friday, 29 December 2000

• fyi- Fifth Circuit Avoids Ruling on Internet Coverage Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 28 December 2000

• Re: Is AAA possible? Charles McCathieNevile
• Fw: FYI David Poehlman

Wednesday, 27 December 2000

• Netscape/Mozilla accessibility effort underway Aaron Leventhal
• Re: SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ Aaron Leventhal

Tuesday, 26 December 2000

• Re: SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ Charles McCathieNevile
• End of Ramadan... Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 25 December 2000

• media: I withdraw my bevocal complaint David Poehlman

Sunday, 24 December 2000

• Re: media: 508 on be vocal Kynn Bartlett
• media: 508 on be vocal David Poehlman

Saturday, 23 December 2000

• Re: Biased New Book Recommendation Kynn Bartlett
• Speech-enabling The Semantic WWW T. V. Raman
• Re: Biased New Book Recommendation David Poehlman
• media:Fw: From the New York Times: Guidelines Set for Web Accessibility [for federal agencies] David Poehlman

Friday, 22 December 2000

• Biased New Book Recommendation Kynn Bartlett
• RE: question on style sheets-recommendations for good books or ur ls? Welna.Sarah
• question on style sheets-recommendations for good books or urls? Alice Anderson
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful David Woolley
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful David Woolley
• Re: Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies David Woolley
• Re: Font tag (was RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed?) David Woolley
• Unofficial Section 508 Web Accessibility Checklist Kynn Bartlett

Thursday, 21 December 2000

• Apology Charles F. Munat
• Re: Is AAA Onerous? David Poehlman
• RE: Is Triple-A possible? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Is Triple-A possible? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Is AAA Onerous? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Is AAA Onerous? Larry G. Hull
• announcement:Fw: Webcast interview re section 508 regs released at last David Poehlman
• Re: Is Triple-A possible? Marti
• RE: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Robert Neff
• RE: Section508 yet again Judy Brewer

Wednesday, 20 December 2000

• RE: Is AAA Onerous? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Question on abbreviations Charles F. Munat
• Re: Question on abbreviations David Poehlman
• RE: Is Triple-A possible? Charles F. Munat
• Re: untill: David Poehlman
• Re: Question on abbreviations Kynn Bartlett
• Re: untill: Kynn Bartlett
• Question on abbreviations Bill Kules
• untill: David Poehlman
• RE: Is AAA Onerous? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Is AAA Onerous? Charles F. Munat
• Checkpoint 3.4 (was: inaccessible site due to css) Charles F. Munat
• Re: Is Triple-A possible? Kynn Bartlett
• Is AAA Onerous? Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed Leonard R. Kasday
• RE: inaccessible site due to css Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Is AAA possible? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Is Triple-A possible? David Poehlman
• RE: Is AAA possible? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• RE: inaccessible site due to css [was: Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful] Charles F. Munat
• Re: Is Triple-A possible? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Is AAA possible? Frank Tobin
• SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ Al Gilman
• Is AAA possible? Jamie Mackay
• RE: Section508 yet again Cynthia Waddell
• Section508 yet again Glenda Watson Hyatt
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 19 December 2000

• Aaagh! [was: Re: PGP MIME Email [was: Re: inaccessible site due to css [was: Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful]]] Chris Croome
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful danield@w3.org
• Re: PGP MIME Email [was: Re: inaccessible site due to css [was: Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful]] Chris Croome
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• PGP MIME Email [was: Re: inaccessible site due to css [was: Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful]] Chris Croome
• inaccessible site due to css [was: Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful] Chris Croome
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Marti
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed David Poehlman
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful David Poehlman
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed Pawley, Neil
• Re: Ref: Good Grief! The Highs and Lows of Usability Testing Kelley Schmidt
• Re: Ref: Good Grief! The Highs and Lows of Usability Testing Kelley Schmidt
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Graham Oliver

Monday, 18 December 2000

• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful - some stats Jamie Mackay
• just what is it that.... Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Over-redundancy of ALT text? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies Chris Croome
• Registration for UIML Europe 2001 is now open Didier Courtaud
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Marti
• Re: Politics: Humanity of Web Designers Davey Leslie
• RE: Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies Charles F. Munat
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• An experiment with a left hand nav Lynn Alford

Sunday, 17 December 2000

• Re: Accessibility and Older Browsers Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies Charles F. Munat

Monday, 18 December 2000

• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 17 December 2000

• Accessibility and Older Browsers Graham Oliver
• RE: Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies Charles F. Munat
• Politics: Humanity of Web Designers Kynn Bartlett
• Politics: Graphic Designers are Allies, not Egotistical Enemies Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Al Gilman
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Davey Leslie
• Re: Over-redundancy of ALT text? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: javascript menus and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Marti
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Davey Leslie

Saturday, 16 December 2000

• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Al Gilman
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Steven McCaffrey
• the law and sticky stuff Paul Davis
• Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Paul Davis
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Marti
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful David Woolley
• Re: Over-redundancy of ALT text? David Woolley
• RE: two or more logical levels ... Charles McCathieNevile
• Politics: The Law As The Big Stick Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Anne Pemberton
• Over-redundancy of ALT text? David Holstius

Friday, 15 December 2000

• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat

Saturday, 16 December 2000

• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Daniel Koger

Friday, 15 December 2000

• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Davey Leslie
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Jim Thatcher
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Chuck Hitchcock
• slashdot/government sites Paul Davis
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Jim Thatcher
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Charles F. Munat
• Re: javascript menus and accessibility David Holstius
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Marti
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• Guideline 11 Interpretation Larry G. Hull
• RE: javascript menus and accessibility Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful David Clark
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Font tag (was RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed?) Ben Morris
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Anne Pemberton
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? David Poehlman
• Re: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Davey Leslie
• Re: slashdot/government sites Chris Croome
• Re: slashdot/government sites Dr Nick Fiddes
• http://www.open.gov.uk Craig Hadley
• RE: Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Charles F. Munat
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? David Woolley
• Re: Font tag Kynn Bartlett
• Font tag (was RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed?) Amanda Tunison
• Politics: Strict Guidelines Considered Harmful Kynn Bartlett
• RE: two or more logical levels ... Charles F. Munat
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Charles F. Munat
• two or more logical levels ... Jim Thatcher
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? David Woolley

Thursday, 14 December 2000

• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: javascript menus and accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Kynn Bartlett
• javascript menus and accessibility Dey Alexander
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Charles F. Munat

Friday, 15 December 2000

• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 14 December 2000

• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Jamie Mackay
• plugs for putatively accessible sites coming online Al Gilman
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Chuck Hitchcock
• slashdot Paul Davis
• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Jim Thatcher
• Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Dr Nick Fiddes
• RE: ADV-HTML Digest - 7 Dec 2000 to 13 Dec 2000 (#2000-172) Charles F. Munat
• Fw: ADV-HTML Digest - 7 Dec 2000 to 13 Dec 2000 (#2000-172) David Poehlman

Wednesday, 13 December 2000

• Re: apology on "alt" tags Philip Ramsey

Tuesday, 12 December 2000

• PRESS RELEASE: Reef Acquires Edapta, Inc. Kynn Bartlett

Monday, 11 December 2000

• RE: HELP!!!! with priority #1.3 Bailey, Bruce
• RE: HELP!!!! with priority #1.3 Steven McCaffrey
• RE: HELP!!!! with priority #1.3 Bailey, Bruce

Saturday, 9 December 2000

• RE: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Robert Neff
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? David Poehlman

Friday, 8 December 2000

• Re: User Controlled Dynamic Page Updates Charles McCathieNevile
• HELP!!!! with priority #1.3 Alice Anderson
• Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Charles McCathieNevile
• New report on WCAG awareness in UK HE. Paul Booth
• Web access gateway mailing list Silas S. Brown
• Re: Web Unusable for Blind according to BBC Financial Internet Experts David Woolley

Thursday, 7 December 2000

• RE: paper on usability and accessibility Gatewood, Joy
• RE: PDFs and Link Mike Scott
• Re: PDFs and Link Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: paper on usability and accessibility Anthony Quinn
• RE: JAWS discards SPAN content? Jim Thatcher

Wednesday, 6 December 2000

• RE: paper on usability and accessibility Jamie Mackay
• Re: PDFs and Link Al Gilman
• Re: PDFs and Link Massey, Nancy
• RE: paper on usability and accessibility Anthony Quinn
• RE: JAWS discards SPAN content? David Holstius
• Re: PDFs and Link Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 5 December 2000

• RE: Accessibility Article - Please offer comments Ball, Guy D
• PDFs and Link Craig Hadley
• Re: Accessibility Article - Please offer comments Kathleen Anderson
• RE: Accessibility Article - Please offer comments Ball, Guy D
• Re: Accessibility Article - Please offer comments Kathleen Anderson
• Accessibility Article - Please offer comments Ball, Guy D

Monday, 4 December 2000

• how far can security go and still be accessible? David Poehlman
• Web Unusable for Blind according to BBC Financial Internet Experts David Woolley
• Re: JAWS discards SPAN content? David Poehlman
• RE: JAWS discards SPAN content? Jim Thatcher
• RE: paper on usability and accessibility Jamie Mackay

Sunday, 3 December 2000

• RE: Flash access: Unclear on the concept Robert Neff
• Re: Flash access: Unclear on the concept David Poehlman
• RE: Flash access: Unclear on the concept Robert Neff
• Re: Flash access: Unclear on the concept Davey Leslie

Saturday, 2 December 2000

• Re: Flash access: Unclear on the concept David Poehlman
• RE: Flash access: Unclear on the concept Robert Neff
• Re: JAWS discards SPAN content? David Woolley
• Re: Flash access: Unclear on the concept Kynn Bartlett
• Flash access: Unclear on the concept Joe Clark
• Re: JAWS discards SPAN content? David Poehlman

Friday, 1 December 2000

• JAWS discards SPAN content? David Holstius
• Re: Server side image maps David Woolley
• paper on usability and accessibility Anthony Quinn
• RE: Server side image maps David Clark
• RE: Server side image maps Jim Thatcher
• Netscape 6 problems Charles F. Munat
• RE: Server side image maps David Clark

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• Re: Server side image maps Kynn Bartlett
• Server side image maps Jim Thatcher
• Media: Salon Embarrassed by Accessibility Error Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Business case study karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• New web resources on learning disability and accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• Business case study accessability group

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Fw: AbleTV.net's monthly town hall meeting webcast . . . David Poehlman
• speech-readers: handling of <HR>==>"---" ; tables linearization s. champ
• speech-readers : user-agent strings s. champ

Sunday, 26 November 2000

• RE: Netsacpe Communicator 4.7 and onkeyup Ricardo Sánchez

Saturday, 25 November 2000

• WAI Initiative in New Zealand (3) Graham Oliver
• WAI Initiative in New Zealand (2) Graham Oliver
• Netsacpe Communicator 4.7 and onkeyup Ricardo Sánchez

Friday, 24 November 2000

• RE: TTY and the phone Charles McCathieNevile
• deaf community use of communication media Paul Davis

Thursday, 23 November 2000

• Re: Form elements in tables Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 22 November 2000

• "at the same time as we 'tell', we should 'illustrate', 'show' and 'demonstrate'." Paul Davis
• "at the same time as we 'tell', we should 'illustrate', 'show' and 'demonstrate'." jonathan chetwynd
• Emacspeak-13.0 (YellowLab) Unleashed! T. V. Raman
• Obscure languages and WCAG Checkpoint 4.1 Adam Alonzo
• RE: Dreamweaver 4 checks sites based on WCAG Robert Neff

Monday, 20 November 2000

• Re: breaking up links David Woolley
• Are you looking for Class A, Hi-Tech office suite? natasha@dynacomcenter.com
• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Kynn Bartlett
• Re: How do I disable JavaScript in IE? Kelly Ford
• How do I disable JavaScript in IE? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: breaking up links Bailey, Bruce
• Re: breaking up links Frank Tobin
• Form elements in tables Monica Ackermann
• Re: breaking up links Charles McCathieNevile
• breaking up links Jamie Mackay
• Fw: Eliminate phone calls & paperwork with On-Line Freight Services! unirush.com

Sunday, 19 November 2000

• Hi! It's me again Nicole
• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Paul Davis

Saturday, 18 November 2000

• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Charles F. Munat
• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Al Gilman
• free t shirt you rart, logo, photo info@epromo5.com
• Re: favicon.ico & no it's Dan! jonathan chetwynd
• Re: favicon.ico Kynn Bartlett
• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Kynn Bartlett
• RE: proper use of abbr and acronym Charles F. Munat

Friday, 17 November 2000

• Re: proper use of abbr and acronym Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Looking for bad JavaScript examples! Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Looking for bad JavaScript examples! Bailey, Bruce
• RE: It's the strangest thing you will ever see! Paul Davis
• Re: Looking for bad JavaScript examples! jeff@cpd2.usu.edu

Thursday, 16 November 2000

• Re: Looking for bad JavaScript examples! Brian Lee Richwine
• Re: It's the strangest thing you will ever see! Daniel Dardailler
• RE: Dreamweaver 4 checks sites based on WCAG Ben Canning
• RE: Dreamweaver 4 checks sites based on WCAG Mike Paciello
• 508 new draft? David Poehlman
• RE: It's the strangest thing you will ever see! Costas Hoplaros
• RE: It's the strangest thing you will ever see! Costas Hoplaros
• It's the strangest thing you will ever see! danield@tux.w3.org
• Re: Dreamweaver 4 checks sites based on WCAG Graham Oliver
• Looking for bad JavaScript examples! Bailey, Bruce

Wednesday, 15 November 2000

• Re: Another JavaScript question! Marti
• Another JavaScript question! Bailey, Bruce

Tuesday, 14 November 2000

• RE: TTY and the phone Cynthia Waddell
• Dreamweaver 4 checks sites based on WCAG B.K. DeLong

Monday, 13 November 2000

• Reminder, UAAG 1.0 Last Call closes today Judy Brewer
• Some results from testing forms errors Scott Luebking

Saturday, 11 November 2000

• Re: TTY and the phone David Poehlman
• Re: TTY and the phone Al Gilman
• TTY and the phone R. Neff
• User Controlled Dynamic Page Updates Joel Sanda

Friday, 10 November 2000

• RE: favicon.ico Dan Cathers
• Reverse the Aging Process 10-20 Years! HGH@isi.fhg.de
• Re: favicon.ico jonathan chetwynd
• Using (RDF) meta-data for Page Accessibility Sean B. Palmer

Thursday, 9 November 2000

• Re: favicon.ico jonathan chetwynd
• Re: favicon.ico Suzanne Nikolaisen

Wednesday, 8 November 2000

• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? David Woolley

Thursday, 9 November 2000

• Re: favicon.ico Dan Cathers

Wednesday, 8 November 2000

• please help:[Fwd: Web Site Problem] David Poehlman
• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? Yuu Morita

Tuesday, 7 November 2000

• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? David Woolley
• Re: Are mailto links a problem for blind users Kelly Ford
• Are mailto links a problem for blind users Anthony Quinn
• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? David Holstius
• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? yuu morita
• RE: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? Reidy Brown
• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 6 November 2000

• Re: How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? David Holstius
• How do I make JavaScript "pop-up help" accessible? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: swapping images Bailey, Bruce
• Suggestions for improved table? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Sunday, 5 November 2000

• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! v@bsvbb.de
• Re: swapping images Charles McCathieNevile
• media:Fw: [webwatch] POP-UP WEATHER ALERT ON THE WAY] David Poehlman

Saturday, 4 November 2000

• The Page Is Ready! -

Sunday, 5 November 2000

• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o cursos@mail.estudar-na.net

Saturday, 4 November 2000

• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! v@bsvbb.de
• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o cursos@mail.estudar-na.net
• favicon.ico jonathan chetwynd
• Re: swapping images David Woolley

Friday, 3 November 2000

• At last, Herbal V, the all natural alternative to V----A! hv@of-hachetal.de
• Media: Wired article on web accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Possible Solution to Text as Graphics Al Gilman
• Re: Usability and accessability Al Gilman
• Re: Possible Solution to Text as Graphics Charles McCathieNevile
• Possible Solution to Text as Graphics Ben Morris
• Usability and accessability sifyalok@sify.com
• User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Last Call Judy Brewer
• Re: Selecting font family Al Gilman

Thursday, 2 November 2000

• Best Practice Accessibility Policy Thomas, Cassandra
• swapping images Jamie Mackay
• RE: Macromedia increasing web access Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Selecting font family (was Re: fixed width Vs relative sizing) Charles McCathieNevile
• Selecting font family (was Re: fixed width Vs relative sizing) Brian Kelly
• Re: fixed width Vs relative sizing Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: fixed width Vs relative sizing sifyalok@sify.com
• Re: fixed width Vs relative sizing Charles McCathieNevile
• fixed width Vs relative sizing Anthony Quinn

Wednesday, 1 November 2000

• Fw: SENIT RNIB Internet Project Report jonathan chetwynd
• Fw: Small Web Site Creation Job David Poehlman
• Re: Artwork on Disabilties and Computers Anne Pemberton
• icons: off topic jonathan chetwynd
• Re: wmf-svg jonathan chetwynd

Tuesday, 31 October 2000

• RE: Artwork on Disabilties and Computers Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: wmf-svg jonathan chetwynd
• Artwork on Disabilties and Computers Michael R. Burks
• Re: wmf-svg Al Gilman
• wmf-svg jonathan chetwynd
• RE: [Fwd: University online policy guidelines] Reidy Brown

Monday, 30 October 2000

• Reading order in tables Bailey, Bruce
• Remove Brockbank, Leslie
• Information re: Email Marketing Report 200930send@bigfoot.com

Sunday, 29 October 2000

• testing forms errors Scott Luebking
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: VIP-L: online accessibility] David Holstius
• RE: FW: Re[2]: Database-driven Web pages Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: VIP-L: online accessibility] David Woolley

Saturday, 28 October 2000

• Re: [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: VIP-L: online accessibility] David Woolley
• Re: Visualisation rather than text David Woolley
• [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: VIP-L: online accessibility] David Poehlman
• Re: Visualisation rather than text jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Visualisation rather than text jonathan chetwynd
• Como Estudar na Internet? secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• Come signup for your Free Vacation dj@freetravelservices.com

Friday, 27 October 2000

• RE: FW: Re[2]: Database-driven Web pages Charles Oppermann
• Re: FW: Re[2]: Database-driven Web pages Lloyd G. Rasmussen
• [Fwd: [webwatch] Fw: VIP-L: Web site accessibility] David Poehlman
• Re: [Fwd: FW: Re[2]: Database-driven Web pages] Al Gilman
• [Fwd: FW: Re[2]: Database-driven Web pages] David Poehlman

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Terry Crowley

Friday, 27 October 2000

• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Kathleen Anderson
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Woolley

Friday, 27 October 2000

• Re: Visualisation rather than text Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Kathleen Anderson
• Re: Visualisation rather than text Paul Bohman
• Re: Here's an idea... geoff freed
• Re: Visualisation rather than text Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

• Re: [media] WAI guidelines yield the highest probability of true Web access David Woolley

Thursday, 26 October 2000

• website accessability guidelines David Poehlman

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

• Re: Visualisation rather than text karl.hebenstreit@gsa.gov
• ParaOlympics Article on Wired.Com Kynn Bartlett
• style vs. design was Re: belittling designers Mitake Holloman Burts
• Cold Fusion - CFMAIL - Replying Emma Hunt
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Al Gilman
• Here's an idea... Suzanne Nikolaisen
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Al Gilman
• Re: Visualisation rather than text Anne Pemberton
• Checkpoint 5.3 (was RE: [media] WAI guidelines yield...) Bailey, Bruce
• [Fwd: University online policy guidelines] David Poehlman
• Re: help Daniel Dardailler
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Kathleen Anderson
• Visualisation rather than text Brian Kelly

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? David Woolley
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? David Woolley
• How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Woolley
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility David Woolley

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

• Estudar na Internet secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• Re: E-commerce and colleges/universities Kynn Bartlett

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• E-commerce and colleges/universities John F. Elmer
• Re: [media] WAI guidelines yield the highest probability of true Web access Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility David Poehlman
• Concert to be Webcast with Closed Captions geoff freed
• RE: [media] WAI guidelines yield the highest probability of true Web access Ben Morris
• Re: [media] WAI guidelines yield the highest probability of true Web access Kelly Ford
• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Timothy Stephen Springer
• [media] WAI guidelines yield the highest probability of true Web access Kathleen Anderson
• Why FrontPage is not a good tool for accessible design (Re: Best tools for accessible design?) Chris Kreussling
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Paul Davis
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Dine, Brooke
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Poehlman
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Woolley

Monday, 23 October 2000

• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Woolley

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Charles F. Munat
• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Charles F. Munat
• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Dick Brown
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility Steve Baty
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility Joyce Taylor
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility Steve Baty
• Re: Challenge: Defining accessibility davey
• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Charles F. Munat
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Charles F. Munat
• RE: Challenge: Defining accessibility Dick Brown
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? davey
• Challenge: Defining accessibility Charles F. Munat
• RE: I would like a response Erica Valle

Monday, 23 October 2000

• RE: Best tools for accessible design? David Clark
• Re: Statistical and other questions Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Statistical and other questions Kathleen Anderson
• Statistical and other questions Amy.Belanger@kohls.com
• RE: A new iconography? Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? David Poehlman
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Poehlman
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Charles F. Munat
• Exploring the definition of "accessibility" (was RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Terry Crowley
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Charles F. Munat
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Poehlman
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Kathleen Anderson
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Ben Morris
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Ball, Guy D
• Re: Best tools for accessible design? Kathleen Anderson
• New Address PSINet CS
• RE: Best tools for accessible design? Terry Crowley
• Best tools for accessible design? Kristi R Schueler/NONFS/USDAFS
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Suzanne Nikolaisen
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• 始めまして　オフィス用品をお安く 小林洋文堂

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Javier Romañach

Monday, 23 October 2000

• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Charles F. Munat
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Estudar-na.Net - Venha conhecer-nos secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net
• Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Paul Davis
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Poehlman
• Re: Netscape6/milestone16 Christoph Löffler
• Re: url correction:Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Woolley
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Woolley
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• RE: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Charles F. Munat
• RE: A new iconography? Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 David Poehlman
• Re: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Kynn Bartlett
• Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 Charles F. Munat
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Anne Pemberton
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Anne Pemberton

Saturday, 21 October 2000

• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Woolley
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Woolley
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: <html> or plain text emails David Woolley
• RE: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Anne Pemberton

Friday, 20 October 2000

• Re: <html> or plain text emails Kynn Bartlett
• Re: <html> or plain text emails Al Gilman
• RE: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Al Gilman
• <html> or plain text emails Craig Hadley
• Re: old hat (I think) Paul Davis
• RE: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Kynn Bartlett
• RE: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Wayne Myers-Education
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Anne Pemberton
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Hiroshi Kawamura
• Re: belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 19 October 2000

• RE: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Charles F. Munat
• Courts not bound by section 508 Michael R. Burks
• belittling designers, two kinds of accessibility Wayne Myers-Education
• old hat (I think) Paul Davis
• RE: A new iconography? Bailey, Bruce
• url correction:Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Woolley
• RE: A new iconography? tom mcCain
• RE: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Anne Pemberton
• RE: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Charles F. Munat

Monday, 16 October 2000

• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) Anne Pemberton

Sunday, 15 October 2000

• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Woolley
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Woolley
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessible...) David Woolley
• Re: Standard Icon Set David Woolley
• Earn $50,000 in 90 Days! larry76_4@vitaminic.co.uk
• How I earned $750.00 per DAY mailing postcards Prosper@home.com

Saturday, 14 October 2000

• Re: In HTML, does the href command attach to space as well as text and graphics? Al Gilman
• Re: In HTML, does the href command attach to space as well as text and graphics? Charles McCathieNevile
• In HTML, does the href command attach to space as well as text and graphics? jonathan chetwynd
• media:[Fwd: GOVERNMENT ACTIONS STIFLING E-COMMERCE] David Poehlman

Friday, 13 October 2000

• WAI in New Zealand Graham Oliver

Thursday, 12 October 2000

• Folder tab interface with real text Leonard R. Kasday
• Re: Web Accessibility Examples Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Web Accessibility Examples Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Web Accessibility Examples Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: text:graphic [3] Charles McCathieNevile
• Please consider linking to edhelper.com 1,000 Webquests and 6,200 Lessons webmaster@edhelper.com

Wednesday, 11 October 2000

• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: A new iconography? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: text:graphic [3] jonathan chetwynd
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Ryan Eby
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Anne Pemberton

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

• Web Accessibility in the UK Martin Sloan
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Clocks Marti
• 6 Million E-mail addresses for $79!! leslie45_23@weblyte.co.uk

Monday, 9 October 2000

• Re: Clocks Phill Jenkins/Austin/IBM
• RE: Web Development Dave J Woolley
• Re: Standard Icon Set Al Gilman
• Re: text:graphic [3] Anne Pemberton
• Re: Clocks kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Standard Icon Set kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Clocks Marti
• Re: Web Development kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Clocks kynn@idyllmtn.com
• Re: How to convince businesses... kynn@idyllmtn.com
• At last, HERBAL V the all natural alternative! rsb@docsj.de

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• cable services 63426672@yahoo.com

Monday, 9 October 2000

• Re: Web Development Mark Andrew Nassy
• Re: text:graphic [3] Al Gilman

Sunday, 8 October 2000

• Re: text:graphic [2] jonathan chetwynd
• standard Sound effect libraries jonathan chetwynd
• RE: text:graphic was: XML? (no, caching) Ricardo Sánchez
• Re: text:graphic was: XML? (no, caching) Anne Pemberton
• Re: text:graphic [2] Al Gilman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) Anne Pemberton
• Re: text:graphic was: XML? (no, caching) Al Gilman
• text:graphic was: XML? (no, caching) jonathan chetwynd
• WOW!!! Highest Payouts Around!!!!!!!! bubblehead32@hotmail.com
• Re: A new iconography? jonathan chetwynd

Saturday, 7 October 2000

• Web Development Suzanne Nikolaisen
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) Anne Pemberton
• Re: XML? (no, caching) Al Gilman
• How to convince businesses to be accessible... Paul Davis
• A new iconography? Paul Davis
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) David Poehlman
• Re: A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) Anne Pemberton
• Early Registration Closing for Conference on Universal Usability Donald Day
• XML? was: a tithe of links. jonathan chetwynd

Friday, 6 October 2000

• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Ryan Eby
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Dave J Woolley
• A new iconography? (was:How to convince businesses to be accessib le...) Dave J Woolley
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Reidy Brown

Thursday, 5 October 2000

• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Poehlman
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Kelly Ford
• Re: SSB Technologies and Java Accessibility Kelly Ford

Friday, 6 October 2000

• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Anne Pemberton

Thursday, 5 October 2000

• RE: Web Accessibility Examples Dave J Woolley
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Timothy Stephen Springer
• SSB Technologies and Java Accessibility Timothy Stephen Springer
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Dave J Woolley
• [media] From the current issue of civic.com - Enabling the disabled Kathleen Anderson
• RE: please help with any info David Clark
• RE: please help with any info Kelly Ford
• Web Accessibility Examples Ball, Guy D
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Poehlman
• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Anne Pemberton
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Paul Davis
• RE: please help with any info David Clark
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Ben Morris
• please help with any info Prof Norm Coombs
• RE: How to convince businesses to be accessible... Dave J Woolley

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• Re: How to convince businesses to be accessible... David Poehlman
• How to convince businesses to be accessible... Kristi R Schueler/NONFS/USDAFS

Thursday, 5 October 2000

• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Anne Pemberton

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• Web Accessibility in Michigan LZelley@aol.com
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Dave J Woolley
• RE: Good Design using Relatively simple HTML Dave J Woolley
• RE: Good Design using Relatively simple HTML Bailey, Bruce

Tuesday, 3 October 2000

• Good Design using Relatively simple HTML Ben Morris
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* Bailey, Bruce
• media: AbleTV.net's coverage of tonight's Presidential Debate . . . Jeffrey Pledger
• RE: Mac/IE/XHTML Problem Michael Cooper
• Request for requirements input for XHTML 2.0 Al Gilman

Monday, 2 October 2000

• Re: Is large print Accessibility? David Poehlman
• RE: Is large print Accessibility? Dave J Woolley
• Re: Is large print Accessibility? David Poehlman
• RE: Is large print Accessibility? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Is large print Accessibility? Dave J Woolley
• Re: Is large print Accessibility? David Poehlman
• RE: Is large print Accessibility? Dave J Woolley
• Re: Is large print Accessibility? David Poehlman
• Re: Is large print Accessibility? Kristi R Schueler/NONFS/USDAFS
• RE: Is large print Accessibility? Dave J Woolley
• Physically disabled children camp TJaskson@aol.com
• Re: Is large print Accessibility? Al Gilman
• Is large print Accessibility? Ben Morris

Sunday, 1 October 2000

• I was paid $23,625 by a complete stranger! In less than a week... alpha@highnetspeed.com
• emoticons jonathan chetwynd
• Rabelais & Dante was Re: Books on my shelf jonathan chetwynd

Last message date: Sunday, 31 December 2000 15:10:34 UTC