- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:20:09 -0500 (EST)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I agree with Dave. In particular, I would make sure that it is clera that the image and the text are associated by including them in the same link, rather than having two seperate links to the same place. cheers Charles McCN On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, David Woolley wrote: > average user as well as one with cognitive disabilities. But under current > guidelines, how does one provide meaningful "alt" text for an image that's > only there to enhance a nearby text (link)? alt="", I would think. However, before you do this, given that many GUI browsers treat alt as "tool-tips", you should make sure that it is totally clear that the text duplicates the icon, even if the icon image is only displayed as a placeholder. If it really is only there to enhance, an nearby really means so near as to be obviously part of the same construct, there is no need for a non-empty alt string. -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia September - November 2000: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Sunday, 17 December 2000 09:22:02 UTC