- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:54:44 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I know this table [1] stinks [2]. I could use TH as a start, but I also have a subheading of sorts (the type of algorithm) and I don't want to have to add a whole column for that semantic (I prefer one row). Any suggested alternative renditions? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmldsig-core-20001031/#sec-AlgID [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-TECHS/#gl-table-markup Forwarded Text ---- >Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:53 -0500 >From: Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> >To: reagle@w3.org >Subject: DSIG spec typos >... >Table in 6.1 > >When I printed the spec, the Algorithm URI's were truncated due to the >lines being too long. This is probably a function of my browser, OS >fonts, and printer. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xmldsig-core-20001031/#sec-AlgID __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 10:54:46 UTC