- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 21:04:55 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Oh, dear. Here I go running you 'round the mulberry bush by not being clear. When I said "here's a thought experiment' I meant 'think how great it would be if we had something where it is as easy as in GuruNet to query - you just poke what you are curious about. And, unlike GuruNet, it could be tuned to return pictures. And no, if you are going to install the image library with a program or a suite of programs, it is not a big deal whether you say c:\foo.bar or file:///c:/foo.bar. Anne, you mentioned search engines that let you ask for pictures. Do you have a favorite? Al At 07:14 PM 2000-10-08 +0100, jonathan chetwynd wrote: >Al, I like to heed your advice and normally agree with you, however I tried >hat at gurunet, no picture as per Anne. > >If I should be using a different link, please be specific if not: ><img src="C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Clipart\Popular\Champgne.wmf"> >what? >as its only going to work with win98 is it a really significant issue? >--- >Most LD users and their carers will have installed applications the standard >way, and they have very large and well designed graphics libraries. >To communicate via the web this means providing different online resources >for each application, and is not universal, however it is practical. It >probably means having a ghastly page saying "you don't seem to have >installed such and such a graphics library in their default location. please >either reinstall or visit... to purchase" however...... >Pages will remain accessible in the rather narrow sense of WAI as alt >tags(and other coding issues)are not effected. >I would like to see a variety of fallback positions to allow cross-posting >and sharing of graphics without requiring installation of complete packages. >I have been asking for a practical universal solution for 2 years, and >happily admit it has taken this long to get near defining the problem. > > I've no doubt misunderstood something so please try and elaborate. eg >perhaps its not practical. > >jonathan chetwynd > >jc@signbrowser.org.uk >IT teacher (learning difficulty) >& accessibility consultant >
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2000 20:42:16 UTC