- From: Jim Thatcher <thatch@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:33:56 -0600
- To: Dr Nick Fiddes <nick@scotweb.ltd.uk>, kynn@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
It is indeed interesting to see a site claiming to be AAA compliant. The home page says "This WAI initiative is now supported by Netscape 6." but the text-only page says: "This WAI initiative is not supported by Netscape." I just thought that was kink of amusing. It is my kind fo writing. Jim jim@jimthatcher.com Accessibility Consulting http://jimthatcher.com 512-306-0931 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dr Nick Fiddes Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:46 PM To: kynn@idyllmtn.com; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Slashdot: How should Govt sites be designed? Those of you on the other side of the pond may be interested to take a look at the UK government's main public site: http://www.open.gov.uk/ It claims 'WAI-AAA' standard of accessibility and though I've not analysed in depth I've seen no reason yet to dispute this. Cheers, Nick -- ____ \__/ Dr Nick Fiddes nick@clan.com / \ Managing Director mobile: 07050 169167 _ \__/ _ ================================================ \\ || // Scotweb Limited, info@scotweb.ltd.uk \\||// 13a Albert Terrace, http://www.scotweb.ltd.uk \||/ Edinburgh EH10 5EA Tel +44 (0) 131 270 8233 || Scotland. Europe. Fax +44 (0) 7020 934 904
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 14:41:07 UTC