- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:49:17 -0400
- To: "Ben Morris" <bmorris@activematter.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Search the WAI mailing lists <http://search.w3.org/> for Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant And you will find a huge, inconclusive, ongoing thread on precisely this topic. Note: Having to use a screen magnifier degrades the usability of the material enough so that it does not automatically remove the idea that the text itself should be scalable. As I say, there is not clear consensus on this thread, but there is that consideration to think about. Al At 01:37 PM 2000-10-02 -0400, Ben Morris wrote: >I would like to pose a question to the group... > >Is large print part of accessibility? > > >This question is primarily geared toward using graphics as text (of course >with alt attributes set) or fixed-size text as links. My own understanding >is that in either case, the links will be just fine for aural browsers and >images turned off. The problem will be present for 2 groups: > > - Visually impaired, but not completely blind. > - Those who need reading glasses. > >The first group (it is my understanding) would have tools at thier disposal >to have access to these images or text, such as screen magnification >programs. So that leaves us with those who need reading glasses, like many >of the middle aged or seniors. They might have the text set to the largest >size, but this would not have any effect on images or text that is specified >to an exact size. > >Now I say the following given that I do not have a full understanding of all >users abilities and equiptment, so I pretty much expect to be somewhat >wrong. It seems to me that using images for text isn't much of a barrier to >legally disabled persons. It could be, however, for someone like my father >who has no disabilities, but does need reading glasses. He might have >trouble trying to view many pages without his glasses, such as >www.citigroup.com which uses smaller sized image-text. > >So I ask you all, am I forgetting any groups? Am I wrong to assume that >those with impaired site (not completely blind) would generally have access >to a screen magnifier? > >Additionally, if this does leave out a group, are there other ways to >accomidate them with such a site? > > - Ben Morris >
Received on Monday, 2 October 2000 14:28:00 UTC