- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 23:36:10 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> However, would you (could you) draw the same parallels with Television or > radio? There is a certain amount of economic divisiveness here also - cost The UK certainly makes this sort of distinction for telephones; there is a "public service" obligation on telephone companies to provide service at a reasonable cost to people who would not be profitable on a purely commercial basis, because universal telephone access is considered good for the country as a whole. Where this is done for internet access it tends to be done in terms of subsidising hardware for schools rather than in terms of encouraging universally accessible content. Like any such government subsidy, there are companies that live off it. It also pushes up the expectations of consumers, leading to more hardware sales, so business likes it. (This has happened since the dawn of the PC.)
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2000 02:54:01 UTC