Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as P ublic WD
Proposal for Bug 3730
Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional
ws-policy 9/28/2006: Upcoming Policy Workshop 2007
Re: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected?
RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
Resolution to Issue 3617
Editors' Draft of the Primer Available - AI 103
[VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27
RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
- Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances
RE: WS-Policy reference indirection
RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances
[VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27
New C14N/1.1 WD and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework (ed. copy)
Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients
NEW ISSUE 3753: Example 1-1 is not a complete security policy
NEW ISSUE 3752: Clarify restrictions of ID type usage
A bit on the formal semantics
Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27
WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0
Suggested text to close Bug 3602
- Re: Suggested text to close Bug 3602
Bug 3705 --- there questions
Issue 3722: Levels of indirection for policy references
NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721
- NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements
- Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
- Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
NEW ISSUE: Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec
Issue 3711 - wsp:PolicyReference can be used in any place where you can use wsp:Policy
Scribe information for the FAQ
Issue 3703 - Clarify that element item always assertion in policy expression
Issue 3708 - Update security considerations section of Framework to include discussion of XML Signature use as well as additional security considerations from Primer
Issue 3710 - clarify that assertion parameters are opaque to framework policy processing
Issue 3711 added - add cross-product description to 4.3.3 in Framework
NEW ISSUE: Editorial corrections and clarifications from UDDI TC (Bugzilla ID 3709)
Position on various issues
Request for today's agenda
input on primer for F2F agenda
RE: 3617 - ACTION 13 Namespace URI versioning policy
Schedule for development of Last Call WDs
Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14
Re: Bug 3549 issue and questions, to complete action 70
WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0
New issue(3662): Use of element wildcard ##any namespace vs ##other namespace
Proposal for Bug 3599
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services
Regrets for actual real-life attendance at f2f
issue 3613 proposed resolution
Proposal for issue 3620
RE: 3559 NEW ISSUE: Conformance Sections needed for both Specs
RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion
Editors request clarification on Primer source(s)
RE: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01
[VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06
- Re: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06
- Re: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06