- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 01:53:35 +0900
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:54:07 UTC
Paul Cotton wrote: > Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 [snip] > > 7. Bugzilla entries that need updating, Chair > Status: I believe the following issues have been resolved but the Bugzilla entries have not yet been updated. > [snip] > > b) Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3562 > Owner: Felix Sasaki > I am not sure if this is closed. The thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0045.html ends with a proposal from Frederik: > My preference is to define the terms that are needed in the Framework in > the Framework document, then additional terms needed in Attachments in > that document. Add note to Attachments that other terms associated with Framework are defined in that document. We don't have made that change in the Attachment document. Should we do that? I would be fine with it. Felix
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 16:54:07 UTC