RE: Position on various issues

Hi Felix, Fabian:

Fabian is quite correct - I believe the text of the issue makes clear
that the problem isn't about working on domain-specific content.  It's
about the fact that our framework defines a generic "intersection"
operation which cannot be relied upon to function correctly in all cases
without domain-specifc knowledge.  And worse, there is no interoperable
way of knowing when such knowledge is needed for a given set of
policies.

I think it's fine (although misguided :)) to suggest that the WG should
solve the issue by leaving things as they are.  I think it's wrong,
however, to suggest that the issue is out of scope.

Thanks,
--Glen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:54 AM
> To: Fabian Ritzmann
> Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Position on various issues
> 
> 
> >
> > Felix Sasaki wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Semantics of
> >>> successful
> >>> intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content
> >>
> >> I think this is out of scope, since we are not chartered to work on
> >> domain-specific content.
> >
> > I don't think this issue is about domain-specific content. 
> It is about
> > providing hints when a policy can not be processed generically.
> 
> If that is the consensus of the working group, they should 
> argue like that
> during the f2f.
> My impression was that this view is not consensus in the 
> working group.
> 
> Felix
> 
> >
> > Fabian
> >
> > --
> > Fabian Ritzmann
> > Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> > Stella Business Park             Phone +358-9-525 562 96
> > Lars Sonckin kaari 12            Fax   +358-9-525 562 52
> > 02600 Espoo                      Email Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM
> > Finland
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 15:16:11 UTC