- From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:41:00 +0100
- To: "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, <public-ws-policy-request@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005201c6dc0a$63c757b0$3901020a@sberyoz>
Thanks... It's a start :-). That said it's not a very informative answer. I've had a chance to examine the spec. I'd appreciate an example please. More specifically, given that such policies have no wire manifestations, it's not clear whether a requester is required to understand such a policy in order to engage in the communication or not (no intersection is involved). In other words, does one have to use wsp:optional to advertize such polices ? It's likely I misunderstand few things about the way a requester should behave hence this question. Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin Iona Technologies WS-PolicyAttachment gives several examples of advertizing policy regardless of any wire manifestations. Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122 "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com> "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com> Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 09/19/2006 11:19 AM To <public-ws-policy@w3.org> cc Subject Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Hello, WS-Policy Framework refers to policy expressions which may have no wire manifestations. Can someone please explain how such polices should be advertized, giving an example if possible. Thanks, Sergey Beryozkin Iona Technologies
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 16:39:57 UTC