- From: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:17:19 -0400
- To: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
- Cc: Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org, "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
- Message-ID: <OFD4957CC5.A0D381D9-ON872571EF.004804DC-852571EF.0048D080@us.ibm.com>
Sergey, I responded to your other mail ...so this is a bit of a repetition. In the guidelines document, Umit and I have attempted to capture "observations" about the use of optional, and this might be a case where it would be useful. I would note that if you're "using the assertion for selection", it could imply that you know what it is. Whether or not it is required on the wire is a facet of the behavior associated with the assertion. Each set of authors is given a set of tools by the specifications, but the authors need to craft the assertions. Maryann "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com> Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 09/20/2006 05:35 AM To "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>, Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS cc <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, <public-ws-policy-request@w3.org> Subject Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Hi there That was a response in a hurry so I take it back. Before flooding the group concalls with trivial issues I'd rather attempt to make my question as clear as possible. Note that I may indeed be confused, but if so then I'd appreciate an answer which would help. Consider this example : <wsp:Policy> <wsp:ExactlyOnce> <oasis:QOSGuarantee> <NeverFails/> <TheBestServiceInThisCategory verifiedBy="..."/> <oasis:QOSGuarantee> <wsp/ExactlyOnce> <wsp:Policy> This is an example of a policy with a single alternative. This alternative contains non-optional assertions defined by a policy profile spec published a month ago. These assertions have no wire manifestations. A ws-policy aware (requester) entity whose runtime has not been updated yet to recognize <oasis:QOSGuarantee> is about to start communicating with the service which advertizes this policy. Given the fact that it's likely ws-policy aware requesters will refuse to start talking to a service should they fail to support the above policy and that the fact whether this requester supports this policy or not will have no effect on the actual communication with the service this policy attached to, my understanding is that such assertions with no wire manifestations SHOULD be marked as wsp:optional : <wsp:Policy> <wsp:ExactlyOnce> <oasis:QOSGuarantee wsp:optional="true"> <!-- --> <oasis:QOSGuarantee> <wsp/ExactlyOnce> <wsp:Policy> This means a requester may use this policy for a service selection but doesn't need to refuse talking to this service should it fail to recognize the policy. Does it make sense ? What is the group's position on this issue ? Thanks Sergey Beryozkin Iona Technologies
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:15:39 UTC