Re: Request for today's agenda

> If we pick a relatively early time, I can be there for the issues
> that I've raised. (I'm in UK time, so the F2F day ends at like, 1am :))
>
> I shall try to be on mostly continuously in the morning, but if we
> have a particular time for these, I can make sure I'm there.

Hello Bijan, all
Note that my intent is mainly to give positions on these issues. The
schedule contains slots for further (or the main) discussion. 1/2 hour for
real discussions would not be enough, and I don't think a complete change
of schedule is necessary / useful.

Felix

>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>> Due to familiy matters, I have to leave early and can participate
>> in the
>> f2f only on Tuesday (today).
>>
>> There are some issues I would like to give my / W3Cs position. So I
>> would
>> like to ask the chairs to allocate some time for them today, about 1/2
>> hour.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Semantics of
>> successful
>> intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3599 Need a URI
>> structure to
>> refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc.
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3620 Policy
>> Attachment to
>> WS-Addr EndpointReferences
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3621 Formal semantics
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3622 Policy assertion
>> equivalence and generality
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 WS-Policy
>> Attachment
>> for WSDL 2.0
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 15:03:54 UTC