> If we pick a relatively early time, I can be there for the issues > that I've raised. (I'm in UK time, so the F2F day ends at like, 1am :)) > > I shall try to be on mostly continuously in the morning, but if we > have a particular time for these, I can make sure I'm there. Hello Bijan, all Note that my intent is mainly to give positions on these issues. The schedule contains slots for further (or the main) discussion. 1/2 hour for real discussions would not be enough, and I don't think a complete change of schedule is necessary / useful. Felix > > Cheers, > Bijan. > > On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> Due to familiy matters, I have to leave early and can participate >> in the >> f2f only on Tuesday (today). >> >> There are some issues I would like to give my / W3Cs position. So I >> would >> like to ask the chairs to allocate some time for them today, about 1/2 >> hour. >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Semantics of >> successful >> intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3599 Need a URI >> structure to >> refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc. >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3620 Policy >> Attachment to >> WS-Addr EndpointReferences >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3621 Formal semantics >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3622 Policy assertion >> equivalence and generality >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 WS-Policy >> Attachment >> for WSDL 2.0 >> >> Thank you, >> >> Felix >> >> > >Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 15:03:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:15 UTC