- From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:44:55 +0100
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>, "Paul Cotton" <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
- Cc: "Maryann Hondo" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Hi Asir Thanks... I understand all that, I even say "Lets take EPR just as an example" to refer to the fact the example is fictitious :-) My question was about the clarifying how an effective policy should be calculated in cases when a policy externally attached to a domain expression such as EPR...I'd prefer to see some general non-normative guidelines on how it should work. I appreciate it's all domain-specific, but IMHO just saying it's all domain-specifc in the section is not ideal... So lets's take an EPR just as an example. Does the specification section 3.4 recommends that a policy attached to domain expressions ( which identify policy subjects, EPR -> endpoint policy subject as an example) replaces all policies that can be collectively associated with that policy subject elsewhere (in the associated WSDL in case of EPR) ? Would it be a valid interpretation when applied to a web servicies domain where WSDLs are used ? I think this is what is currently recommended : "policies contained within a policy subject (say an EPR or another policy subject) aren't in-scope with respect to an external policy attachment." Or may be not... It's domain-specific... I believe this should be clarified further as a general non-normative recommenadtion... Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin Iona Technologies
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 11:45:24 UTC