Nope. It's rather assume it is my question which is causing the confusion.
I'll sumbit a new issue which will hopefully result in an answer...
Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin
I think you are getting confused with policy intersection and wire format. WS-SecurityPolicy is an example where the domain has chosen policy assertions that express wire format but that is the choice of the domain. Policy intersection can happen w/o having to express wire formats.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
"Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
09/19/2006 11:41 AM
To
Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
cc
<public-ws-policy@w3.org>, <public-ws-policy-request@w3.org>
Subject
Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
Thanks... It's a start :-).
That said it's not a very informative answer. I've had a chance to examine the spec. I'd appreciate an example please.
More specifically, given that such policies have no wire manifestations, it's not clear whether
a requester is required to understand such a policy in order to engage in the communication or not (no intersection is involved).
In other words, does one have to use wsp:optional to advertize such polices ?
It's likely I misunderstand few things about the way a requester should behave hence this question.
Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin
Iona Technologies
WS-PolicyAttachment gives several examples of advertizing policy regardless of any wire manifestations.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
"Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
09/19/2006 11:19 AM
To
<public-ws-policy@w3.org>
cc
Subject
Policy expressions with no wire manifestation
Hello,
WS-Policy Framework refers to policy expressions which may have no wire manifestations.
Can someone please explain how such polices should be advertized, giving an example if possible.
Thanks, Sergey Beryozkin
Iona Technologies
