public-ws-policy@w3.org from September 2006 by date

Saturday, 30 September 2006

• Updated Editors Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Primer - For Approval as P ublic WD Prasad Yendluri
• Proposal for Bug 3730 Ashok Malhotra

Friday, 29 September 2006

• RE: WS-Policy reference indirection Daniel Roth
• Simplifying the meaning of assertions and wsp:optional Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin

Thursday, 28 September 2006

• ws-policy 9/28/2006: Upcoming Policy Workshop 2007 Monica J. Martin
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Prasad Yendluri
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Frederick Hirsch
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Daniel Roth
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Christopher B Ferris
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Daniel Roth
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Frederick Hirsch

Wednesday, 27 September 2006

• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Prasad Yendluri
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Prasad Yendluri
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Ashok Malhotra
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Frederick Hirsch
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Glen Daniels
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Glen Daniels
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Glen Daniels
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Frederick Hirsch
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Issue 3712 - wsp:PolicyReference can be used in any place where you can use wsp:Policy Daniel Roth
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: RE: Schedule for development of Last Call WDs Paul Cotton
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Daniel Roth
• RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617 Paul Cotton
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Maryann Hondo
• Re: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: Schedule for development of Last Call WDs Felix Sasaki
• RE: Schedule for development of Last Call WDs Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Resolution to Issue 3617 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Resolution to Issue 3617 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 26 September 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE 3752: Clarify restrictions of ID type usage Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27 David Orchard
• RE: Editors' Draft of the Primer Available - AI 103 Paul Cotton
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Daniel Roth
• Editors' Draft of the Primer Available - AI 103 Prasad Yendluri

Monday, 25 September 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE 3753: Example 1-1 is not a complete security policy Daniel Roth
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: WS-Policy reference indirection Daniel Roth
• [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27 Paul Cotton
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Daniel Roth
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Sergey Beryozkin

Sunday, 24 September 2006

• RE: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sverdlov, Yakov

Saturday, 23 September 2006

• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Anthony Nadalin

Friday, 22 September 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE 3752: Clarify restrictions of ID type usage Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 Daniel Roth
• RE: WS-Policy reference indirection Paul Denning
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all cir cumstances Prasad Yendluri
• RE: WS-Policy reference indirection Daniel Roth
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Henry, William
• RE: ISSUE 3564: Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances Daniel Roth
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Maryann Hondo
• RE: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Mark Little
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Mark Little
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin

Wednesday, 20 September 2006

• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27 Paul Cotton
• RE: NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Paul Cotton
• RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion Paul Cotton
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation William Henry
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• New C14N/1.1 WD and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework (ed. copy) Jose Kahan
• Re: Scribe information for the FAQ Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Maryann Hondo
• Re: Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Maryann Hondo
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Maryann Hondo
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE 3753: Example 1-1 is not a complete security policy Anthony Nadalin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Anthony Nadalin

Tuesday, 19 September 2006

• Re: Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Maryann Hondo
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Sverdlov, Yakov
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• Behaviour of WS-Policy aware clients Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Anthony Nadalin
• Policy expressions with no wire manifestation Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Sverdlov, Yakov
• NEW ISSUE 3753: Example 1-1 is not a complete security policy Fabian Ritzmann
• NEW ISSUE 3752: Clarify restrictions of ID type usage Fabian Ritzmann

Friday, 15 September 2006

• Re: A bit on the formal semantics Bijan Parsia
• Re: A bit on the formal semantics Anne Anderson
• A bit on the formal semantics Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 14 September 2006

• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 10 - 2006-09-27 Paul Cotton
• WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Issue 3711 added - add cross-product description to 4.3.3 in Framework Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Monica J. Martin
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Daniel Roth
• RE: Issue 3711 added - add cross-product description to 4.3.3 in Framework Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Issue 3703 - Clarify that element item always assertion in policy expression Asir Vedamuthu
• Suggested text to close Bug 3602 Ashok Malhotra

Wednesday, 13 September 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Daniel Roth
• Bug 3705 --- there questions Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Issue 3711 added - add cross-product description to 4.3.3 in Framework Frederick Hirsch
• NEW ISSUE: Non normative recommendation on calculating effective polices for arbitrary XML elements Sergey Beryozkin
• Issue 3722: Levels of indirection for policy references Paul Cotton
• NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 William Henry
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec Paul Cotton
• NEW ISSUE: Terms should be defined/targeted in the appropriate sections of the spec Glen Daniels
• Issue 3711 - wsp:PolicyReference can be used in any place where you can use wsp:Policy Bezrukov, Vladislav
• RE: Position on various issues Ashok Malhotra
• Scribe information for the FAQ Glen Daniels
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Sverdlov, Yakov
• RE: Position on various issues Glen Daniels
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Anthony Nadalin
• Issue 3703 - Clarify that element item always assertion in policy expression Frederick Hirsch
• Issue 3708 - Update security considerations section of Framework to include discussion of XML Signature use as well as additional security considerations from Primer Frederick Hirsch
• Issue 3710 - clarify that assertion parameters are opaque to framework policy processing Frederick Hirsch
• Issue 3711 added - add cross-product description to 4.3.3 in Framework Frederick Hirsch
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Sverdlov, Yakov
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: Position on various issues Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: Position on various issues Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 12 September 2006

• NEW ISSUE: Editorial corrections and clarifications from UDDI TC (Bugzilla ID 3709) Toufic Boubez
• Re: Position on various issues Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: Position on various issues Bijan Parsia
• Re: Position on various issues Felix Sasaki
• Re: Position on various issues Bijan Parsia
• Position on various issues Felix Sasaki
• RE: New issue(3662): Use of element wildcard ##any namespace vs ##other namespace David Orchard
• Re: Request for today's agenda Bijan Parsia
• Re: Request for today's agenda Felix Sasaki
• Re: Request for today's agenda Bijan Parsia
• Request for today's agenda Felix Sasaki
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: New issue(3662): Use of element wildcard ##any namespace vs ##other namespace Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14 Bijan Parsia
• input on primer for F2F agenda Maryann Hondo
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14 David Orchard

Monday, 11 September 2006

• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Bob Freund-Hitachi
• RE: NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Jacek Kopecky
• RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as aWS-Policy assertion Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as aWS-Policy assertion Asir Vedamuthu

Sunday, 10 September 2006

• RE: 3617 - ACTION 13 Namespace URI versioning policy Asir Vedamuthu

Saturday, 9 September 2006

• Re: WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 Anthony Nadalin
• Schedule for development of Last Call WDs Paul Cotton

Friday, 8 September 2006

• RE: WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 Asir Vedamuthu
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 09 - 2006-09-12 - 14 Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Bug 3549 issue and questions, to complete action 70 Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Bug 3549 issue and questions, to complete action 70 Frederick Hirsch
• WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: issue 3613 proposed resolution Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Sergey Beryozkin
• New issue(3662): Use of element wildcard ##any namespace vs ##other namespace David Orchard
• Proposal for Bug 3599 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Ashok Malhotra
• NEW ISSUE: Clarify the policy model for Web Services Sverdlov, Yakov

Thursday, 7 September 2006

• Regrets for actual real-life attendance at f2f David Orchard
• issue 3613 proposed resolution Frederick Hirsch
• Proposal for issue 3620 Glen Daniels
• RE: 3559 NEW ISSUE: Conformance Sections needed for both Specs Asir Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 6 September 2006

• Re: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Felix Sasaki
• Re: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Felix Sasaki
• RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: [Bug 3656] Using UsingAddressing Extension Element as a WS-Policy assertion Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Editors request clarification on Primer source(s) Paul Cotton
• Re: [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Bijan Parsia
• Editors request clarification on Primer source(s) David Orchard
• RE: Action Item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/12-ws-policy-minutes.html#action01 Paul Cotton
• [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Paul Cotton

Tuesday, 5 September 2006

• WS-Policy Editors drafts available David Orchard
• RE: NEW ISSUE: (3623) Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL Paul Cotton
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Semantics of successful intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content Daniel Roth

Monday, 4 September 2006

• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Paul Cotton
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Anthony Nadalin
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 09 - 2006-09-06 Paul Cotton

Sunday, 3 September 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE (3638) Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions Daniel Roth

Saturday, 2 September 2006

• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Asir Vedamuthu

Friday, 1 September 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Daniel Roth
• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Daniel Roth
• Re: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Bijan Parsia
• RE: Does the selected Policy alternative apply in both directions? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Issue 3620 is out of scope Sergey Beryozkin
• External Policy Attachment usecase Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Issue 3557 (was ACTION 53 Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG Asir Vedamuthu

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2006 18:17:19 UTC