RE: Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-09-11 (public-ws-policy@w3.org from September 2006)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:30:11 +0100
To: <asirveda@microsoft.com>, <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>, <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Cc: <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC95225504BFED9A@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>

> A policy externally attached to it takes precedence
> over policies which can be directly or indirectly 
> attached inside an EPR itself.

Given WS-Addressing doesn't specify if meta-data sent in an EPR
in a SOAP message usurps meta-data available elsewhere, 
and WSDL doesn't help people divine which of the many WSDL 
documents which may describe a service is "the daddy",
I can't see what this WG can realistically do here either, 
except maybe allow someone to publish a WS-MetaDataPresidencePolicy 
language at some point in the future.

Paul

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 11:30:36 UTC