RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617

Actually I thought the minutes were fairly clear here since they outlined exactly the changes to be made:


<PaulC> Re bullet 1: No change is necessary

<asir> Related editorial action is http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/23

<PaulC> Re bullet 2: change "preponderence" to "vast majority"

<PaulC> Re bullet 3: s/cardinality of elements/cardinality of elements (i.e.

<PaulC> modifications to minOccurs or maxOccurs attribute value of an element

<PaulC> declaration)/.


BTW I have already marked this issue as FIXED in Bugzilla.

/paulc
________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent: September 26, 2006 9:02 PM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617



Apologies. Forgot to add the pointer to the minutes where the issue was discussed [1].

--umit


[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-ws-policy-minutes.html

___________________________  __________________
From:   Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent:   Tuesday, Sep 26, 2006 5:58 PM
To:     public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject:        Resolution to Issue 3617


Folks,

I was reading the minutes. I am sure approval of the minutes of the f2f will come up tomorrow. I really can not follow the conclusion and the resolution of the namespace policy. If I do not understand it as the issue owner, I can not really close it. ;-)

Could we review the outcome? Probably the minutes need to be updated to reflect the reality better as well.

Thanks.

--umit

----------------------

Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
Architect
NetWeaver Industry Standards
SAP Labs, LLC
Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095
SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238
--------
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you,
then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi

Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 13:50:47 UTC