RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617

Actually I thought the minutes were fairly clear here since they outlined exactly the changes to be made:

<PaulC> Re bullet 1: No change is necessary

<asir> Related editorial action is

<PaulC> Re bullet 2: change "preponderence" to "vast majority"

<PaulC> Re bullet 3: s/cardinality of elements/cardinality of elements (i.e.

<PaulC> modifications to minOccurs or maxOccurs attribute value of an element

<PaulC> declaration)/.

BTW I have already marked this issue as FIXED in Bugzilla.

From: On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent: September 26, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617

Apologies. Forgot to add the pointer to the minutes where the issue was discussed [1].



___________________________  __________________
From:   Yalcinalp, Umit
Sent:   Tuesday, Sep 26, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject:        Resolution to Issue 3617


I was reading the minutes. I am sure approval of the minutes of the f2f will come up tomorrow. I really can not follow the conclusion and the resolution of the namespace policy. If I do not understand it as the issue owner, I can not really close it. ;-)

Could we review the outcome? Probably the minutes need to be updated to reflect the reality better as well.




Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
NetWeaver Industry Standards
Email: Tel: (650) 320-3095
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you,
then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi

Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 13:50:47 UTC