public-w3process@w3.org from September 2014 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September David (Standards) Singer
Re: Please Review: Working Draft for new Process Document Arthur Barstow
Minutes from today chaals@yandex-team.ru
New draft - Fwd: Please Review: Working Draft for new Process Document chaals@yandex-team.ru
w3process-ACTION-34: Open issue on removing coordination groups Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Jeff Jaffe

Monday, 29 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September chaals@yandex-team.ru
RE: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Stephen Zilles

Sunday, 28 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Jeff Jaffe

Thursday, 25 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September chaals@yandex-team.ru
RE: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Stephen Zilles

Wednesday, 24 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Daniel Glazman

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 30 September Jeff Jaffe
FW: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 23 September Stephen Zilles

Monday, 22 September 2014

RE: ISSUE-115 - group status information Stephen Zilles

Friday, 19 September 2014

w3process-ISSUE-142 (AB role/structure): Are the role and structure of the AB adequately defined? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 18 September 2014

w3process-ISSUE-141 (Errata): Improve Errata management in W3C [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Marcos Caceres
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
w3process-ISSUE-140 (The Team in the process): The description of the Team in Section 2.2 of the process document is out of date [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Jeff Jaffe
agenda requests... chaals@yandex-team.ru
w3process-ISSUE-139 (non-members in member submission): What are the rights and obligations of non-member participants in the creation of a member submission [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) chaals@yandex-team.ru

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer

Tuesday, 16 September 2014

Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Robin Berjon
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
RE: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) GALINDO Virginie
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Robin Berjon
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Marcos Caceres
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) Daniel Glazman
ISSUE-138: Does the process assume �??an�?? editor, or is group-editing formally ok? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) David (Standards) Singer
Re: ISSUE-115 - group status information chaals@yandex-team.ru
w3process-ISSUE-137 (rationalise heartbeat): Rationalise the heartbeats in chapter 6 and 7 [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 15 September 2014

w3process-ISSUE-136 (Public input): Does process adequately cater for public input [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-135 (AC appeal in WG): Direct appeal of WG decisions for AC? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-134 (Appeal non-WG creation): Appeal against decisions *not* to create a group? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 14 September 2014

w3process-ISSUE-133 (TAG role): Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] Arthur Barstow
w3process-ISSUE-132 (voting): Change the voting system for elections? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-131 (meetings and workshops): Clarify the requirements on meetings and workshops [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-130 (BG CG process): Should the Process define Business and Community Groups? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 13 September 2014

Moved ISSUE-107 chaals@yandex-team.ru
Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing) chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: IPR briefing for new charters… chaals@yandex-team.ru
New draft available chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: IPR briefing for new charters… Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: IPR briefing for new charters… Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
IPR briefing for new charters… chaals@yandex-team.ru
ISSUE-115 - group status information chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] Jeff Jaffe
w3process-ISSUE-128 (Lack of Test Cases): Lack of test cases is a major contributor to schedule delay. [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-127 (Horizontal Group Input): Can we improve input from 'horizontal' groups (WAI, I18N, ...) [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Daniel Glazman
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Sam Ruby
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Marcos Caceres
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] David (Standards) Singer

Friday, 12 September 2014

Thursday, 11 September 2014

Re: Status of the 12 High Priority Topics considered for Process2014. Jeff Jaffe
Process lessons from Web Performance? Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] David (Standards) Singer
Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] Boris Zbarsky
Status of the 12 High Priority Topics considered for Process2014. Stephen Zilles
Re: Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] David (Standards) Singer
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Boris Zbarsky
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Philippe Le Hegaret
Comment tracking for navigation-timing CR [Was: Re: publishing new WD of URL spec] Arthur Barstow
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Boris Zbarsky
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Chris Wilson
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Daniel Glazman
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Boris Zbarsky
Moving Posts Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Karl Dubost
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Glenn Adams
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Glenn Adams
Re: publishing new WD of URL spec James Robinson
RE: publishing new WD of URL spec Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Re: publishing new WD of URL spec Glenn Adams
RE: publishing new WD of URL spec Domenic Denicola
RE: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] David (Standards) Singer
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Daniel Glazman
Re: w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Arthur Barstow
w3process-ISSUE-126 (autoWDpublish): Automatic WD publishing tool may change the W3C center of gravity around WGs [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Monday, 8 September 2014

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Appelquist
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Chris Wilson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Chris Wilson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec David Singer
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Chris Wilson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Chris Wilson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec David Singer
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec David Singer
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec David Singer
Off topic? Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: Issue-123 [Was: Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September Daniel Glazman
Issue-123 [Was: Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September Arthur Barstow
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Steve Faulkner
Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September Daniel Glazman
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Glazman
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Glazman
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Ian Hickson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September chaals@yandex-team.ru

Monday, 1 September 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Yoav Weiss
Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September Stephen Zilles
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Glazman
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Glazman
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Daniel Glazman

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 22:12:16 UTC