- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:43:06 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 16/09/2014 15:18 , Daniel Glazman wrote: > On 16/09/2014 15:06, Daniel Glazman wrote: >> AFAIK, the oldest WG in the Consortium, the CSS WG, has never used >> Standing. Each time we discussed it, it was either impractical or >> impossible. I think we should be able to ditch it _entirely_ except in >> the case of AB and TAG. > > Let me add one important thing: we're here to gather all good ideas > wherever they come from, for the greatest benefit of the Web. I can't > imagine a reasonable Chair refusing to register a vote or poll for a > Member in "bad standing" if that Member contributes a technically valid > and useful point of view... And if they're contributing a technically invalid or useless point of view, being in good standing isn't going to help them much either. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:43:19 UTC