Re: Issue-123 [Was: Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 2 September from Daniel Glazman on 2014-09-02 (public-w3process@w3.org from September 2014)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:24:54 +0200
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <5405C526.6020002@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 02/09/2014 14:23, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> This seems like a `common sense` recommendation that {s,c}ould be
> included in some type of constantly evolving non-normative `best
> practices` type document (rather than a hard-coded requirement in some
> version of the normative PD).

Agreed.

</Daniel>

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 13:25:23 UTC