- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:46:01 -0400
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On September 2, 2014 at 6:32:11 PM, Chris Wilson (cwilso@google.com) wrote: > > I, for one, speaking as an individual would hope the answer to > that continues to be "no." <snip> > The W3C and the WHATWG have fundamental differences in working > model. Ok, but then W3C has to fork for real. But, given how terrible a job the W3C has done thus far with forking WHAWTG specs, it's a shame tho because it's just going to continue to hurt the Web. The W3C and related Editors could be doing more productive things (i.e., as Hixie said, this is precisely "wasting editing resources in this idiotic fashion"). Here is hoping the W3C and Editors who participate in the copy/pasting will come to their senses and stop this practice.
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 22:46:29 UTC